On Apr 5, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:35:07 +0100, Dermot Beirne said:
>>
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:40:44 +0100, Dermot Beirne said:
I'm sure that would be fine, but I'm having difficulty automatically
determining which volumes are ok to
On Apr 5, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:35:07 +0100, Dermot Beirne said:
>>
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:40:44 +0100, Dermot Beirne said:
I'm sure that would be fine, but I'm having difficulty automatically
determining which volumes are ok
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:35:07 +0100, Dermot Beirne said:
>
> >> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:40:44 +0100, Dermot Beirne said:
> >>
> >> I'm sure that would be fine, but I'm having difficulty automatically
> >> determining which volumes are ok to prune. I need to compare the last
> >> written time
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:40:44 +0100, Dermot Beirne said:
>
> I'm sure that would be fine, but I'm having difficulty automatically
> determining which volumes are ok to prune. I need to compare the last
> written time to the current time and the volumes retention, and check the
> job type and s
On 5 Apr 2011 03:43, "Dylan Vanderhoof" wrote:
>
> Why not run a manual prune command via cron and bconsole for night maint
rather than hitting the DB directly?
>
> I ran into issues where my tapes weren't getting cycled as fast as I'd
like, so basically did what you are talking about via bconsole
Why not run a manual prune command via cron and bconsole for night maint rather
than hitting the DB directly?
I ran into issues where my tapes weren't getting cycled as fast as I'd like, so
basically did what you are talking about via bconsole/cron and it seems to have
solved the problem.
-D
