In the message dated: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:57:34 +0200,
The pithy ruminations from Sysadmin Worldsoft on
were:
=> Hello John,
=>
=> John Drescher a écrit :
=>
=> > You did not give any details of your systems. I assume you have a
=> > gigabit network between all the involved systems. What data
In the message dated: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:57:34 +0200,
The pithy ruminations from Sysadmin Worldsoft on
were:
Hello John,
>
John Drescher a icrit :
>
> You did not give any details of your systems. I assume you have a
> gigabit network between all the involved systems. What database are
> yo
Michael Nelson wrote:
> I find that the overall throughput for my gigabit-connected LTO-3
> jukebox seems to depend more on the makeup of the files being backed up
> than anything.
>
Sorry, but that is confusing language, and could be misinterpreted easily.
What I should have said is that th
John Drescher wrote:
> Are you using spooling on the backup with 7 million files?
Yes, John... all my jobs are spooled to disc then to tape.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
> It's VERY fast on backups where it is doing large to medium files, and
> VERY slow on backups where it has to back up millions of tiny files. I
> have three webservers I back up that fit the "millions of small files"
> definition, and a full backup of each of them takes about 3 hours
> apiece.
> I backup a directory mounted on the same server which the library is
> connected.
>
I assume you mean the raid array that contains the data is on the
server and it is not nfs mounted...
>
> [Directory on NAS Powervault 220S<> Raid Controller] <-> Server <->
> [SCSI Adaptec 39160 <> Tape Library
Sysadmin Worldsoft wrote:
> I try to backup 193GB with bacula 2.0.3 on a tape library Powervault
> 124T with LTO3.
>
> The backup take 7 hours to terminate. The specification for PV 124T is
> "Supports maximum native transfer rates of 288GB/hr (LTO-3)"
>
> Any idea for this problem ?
>
I find
Hello John,
John Drescher a écrit :
> You did not give any details of your systems. I assume you have a
> gigabit network between all the involved systems. What database are
> you using? Did you properly set up the indexes? Are you using
> spooling?
>
I backup a directory mounted on the same se
maximum speeds on a tape drive are kinda like maximum capacity on your
broadband connection.
what's advertised and what you'll get are two different things.
I have that same DELL drive, and I'm seeing about 60gb/hour, which I
feel is reasonable for LTO3 with no compression... your numbers aren't
On 4/24/07, Sysadmin Worldsoft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I try to backup 193GB with bacula 2.0.3 on a tape library Powervault
> 124T with LTO3.
>
> The backup take 7 hours to terminate. The specification for PV 124T is
> "Supports maximum native transfer rates of 288GB/hr (LTO-3)"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Using 100baseT? This document might help explain things:
http://www.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/power/en/ps4q02_wolfram?c=us&cs=555&l=en&s=biz
- -Proto
Sysadmin Worldsoft wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I try to backup 193GB with bacula 2.0.3 on a
11 matches
Mail list logo
