On 11/22/2012 7:09 PM, James Harper wrote:
>> And for the file volumes either:
>>
>> 12 x 600GB 15K SAS (RAID 5 or 6?) - faster disks (or is it in a raid 5?) and
>> less
>> space (approx 6TB)
>>
>> OR
>>
>> 12 x 2TB 7.2K SAS/SATA (RAID 10) - slower disks but more space (approx
>> 11.18 TB)
>>
> If
Once upon a time, John Kenyon said:
> 2 x 300GB 15K SAS (RAID 1) - This will have OS (centos 64 bit) and Bacula
> MySQL catalog
I have a new server running RHEL 6 with 15K SAS RAID1 for the OS. It
has an external disk shelf with 12 2TB 7200 RPM SATA drives connected to
a regular (non-RAID) SAS
On 11/22/2012 6:05 PM, John Kenyon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Wondering what peoples thoughts/experiences are with the following (or
> similar) single bacula server in regards to disk configuration:
>
> 2 x 300GB 15K SAS (RAID 1) - This will have OS (centos 64 bit) and Bacula
> MySQL catalog
>
> And fo
Hi James,
> If you are backing up over 1Gbit/s ethernet then you require a storage that
> can write at a maximum of 100mbytes/s and either configuration should be
> more than capable of handling way more than that, assuming that it never
> gets ridiculously fragmented. If you use RAID5 then I reco
>
> And for the file volumes either:
>
> 12 x 600GB 15K SAS (RAID 5 or 6?) - faster disks (or is it in a raid 5?) and
> less
> space (approx 6TB)
>
> OR
>
> 12 x 2TB 7.2K SAS/SATA (RAID 10) - slower disks but more space (approx
> 11.18 TB)
>
If you are backing up over 1Gbit/s ethernet then y
