Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation fault of Storage Daemon when client is not available

2011-09-21 Thread Thomas Lohman
Just to followup on this in case others have this issue. I was able to rebuild bacula with the -g compiler option to get some debugging information. The scenario that causes the SD to crash with a SEGFAULT is not consistently reproducible which makes me think of some kind of race condition.

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation fault of Storage Daemon when client is not available

2011-09-02 Thread John Drescher
> Thanks John for your reply, can I ask if you use SSL to encrypt between the > client and the server? No. I do not use any encryption at all. > Also, when you say the clients are not connected > when they are scheduled, does that also imply that their jobs fail i.e. when > it comes around to run

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation fault of Storage Daemon when client is not available

2011-09-02 Thread Josh Fisher
On 9/2/2011 10:50 AM, John Drescher wrote: >> I'm wondering if anyone else here has experienced this problem >> and/or has any pointers to a work around. While things can be set up to >> automatically restart the storage daemon if it dies, the main problem is >> that any backups Bacula was in t

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation fault of Storage Daemon when client is not available

2011-09-02 Thread John Drescher
>  I'm wondering if anyone else here has experienced this problem > and/or has any pointers to a work around.  While things can be set up to > automatically restart the storage daemon if it dies, the main problem is > that any backups Bacula was in the middle of doing end with an error and > have t

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation fault of Storage Daemon when client is not available

2011-09-02 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:19:40 -0400, Thomas Lohman said: > > Hi, > > We've been seeing our Bacula Storage Daemon die with a segmentation > fault when a client can't be reached for backup. We have two servers > and have observed this behavior on both of them. Some searching has > reveale