Just to followup on this in case others have this issue. I was able to
rebuild bacula with the -g compiler option to get some debugging
information. The scenario that causes the SD to crash with a SEGFAULT
is not consistently reproducible which makes me think of some kind of
race condition.
> Thanks John for your reply, can I ask if you use SSL to encrypt between the
> client and the server?
No. I do not use any encryption at all.
> Also, when you say the clients are not connected
> when they are scheduled, does that also imply that their jobs fail i.e. when
> it comes around to run
On 9/2/2011 10:50 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>> I'm wondering if anyone else here has experienced this problem
>> and/or has any pointers to a work around. While things can be set up to
>> automatically restart the storage daemon if it dies, the main problem is
>> that any backups Bacula was in t
> I'm wondering if anyone else here has experienced this problem
> and/or has any pointers to a work around. While things can be set up to
> automatically restart the storage daemon if it dies, the main problem is
> that any backups Bacula was in the middle of doing end with an error and
> have t
> On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:19:40 -0400, Thomas Lohman said:
>
> Hi,
>
> We've been seeing our Bacula Storage Daemon die with a segmentation
> fault when a client can't be reached for backup. We have two servers
> and have observed this behavior on both of them. Some searching has
> reveale