Re: [Bacula-users] Reality check

2007-10-09 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, John Drescher wrote: > On 10/9/07, Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I recently migrated from an LTO-1 drive (in a PowerVault 122T) to >> an LTO-3 (PowerVault 124T). >> >> Bacula (2.0.3) is locally configured to spool up to 50 GB to disk >> before writing to tape. B

Re: [Bacula-users] Reality check

2007-10-09 Thread John Drescher
On 10/9/07, Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I recently migrated from an LTO-1 drive (in a PowerVault 122T) to an > LTO-3 (PowerVault 124T). > > Bacula (2.0.3) is locally configured to spool up to 50 GB to disk > before writing to tape. Bacula reports that transfer rates have risen > from

Re: [Bacula-users] Reality Check: Multiple fd's on a machine

2005-10-14 Thread Russell Howe
nathan r. hruby wrote: > Yes, but this requires a seperate bacula-fd for each HA service address True, if you have many services then it could get a bit messy, but I don't mind having lots of jobs... it makes it easy for me to see where disk space is being eaten most rapidly, for example. -- Rus

Re: [Bacula-users] Reality Check: Multiple fd's on a machine

2005-10-14 Thread nathan r. hruby
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Russell Howe wrote: nathan r. hruby wrote: Hi, I have a small HA cluster using shared storage. The shared storage mounting is handled by the cluster software and follows the services that require the shared storage points. Obviously I'd like to back up this shared storag

Re: [Bacula-users] Reality Check: Multiple fd's on a machine

2005-10-14 Thread Russell Howe
nathan r. hruby wrote: > Hi, > > I have a small HA cluster using shared storage. The shared storage > mounting is handled by the cluster software and follows the services that > require the shared storage points. Obviously I'd like to back up this > shared storage. > > Since these disks move ar