On Saturday 04 March 2006 01:50, Scott Barninger wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 19:33 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> > AFAIK, cygwin is no longer used. Everything is native Windows now.
> >
> > "If you want to build the Win32 binaries, you will need a Microsoft
> > Visual C++ compiler (or Visual Stu
Erich Prinz wrote:
Super. That actually helps a ton. Thought I was losing my mind.
I have VS Express and presume that will be sufficient for compiling
sake. Looks like there are other pieces to the puzzle that need to
happen and will check back in through the process.
For VC++ Express-spec
On 3 Mar 2006 at 19:34, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 4 Mar 2006 at 0:32, hikari wrote:
>
> > Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > > AFAIK, cygwin is no longer used. Everything is native Windows
> > > now.
> > >
> >
> > The documentation in the source tree still talks about using Cygwin
> > to do an init
On 4 Mar 2006 at 0:32, hikari wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > AFAIK, cygwin is no longer used. Everything is native Windows now.
> >
>
> The documentation in the source tree still talks about using Cygwin
> to do an initial configure before using VC++ to do the compile.
Do you have a URL
Dan Langille wrote:
> AFAIK, cygwin is no longer used. Everything is native Windows now.
The documentation in the source tree still talks about using Cygwin
to do an initial configure before using VC++ to do the compile.
--
Chris Crowther
---
