Hello Ryan,
I'm not sure of my understanding of "recycle oldest" but I think it
permit to reuse a volume wich all jobs and files are out of retention
regardless of the volume retention.
So, it is useless if VolRetention I would like to echo this question... not sure why both of those steps
> would
I would like to echo this question... not sure why both of those steps
would be needed. My guess is because either of them might be on or off
(AutoPrune and Prune Oldest Volume).
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III
|$&| |__| | | |
On Thursday 01 December 2005 10:48, Ludovic Strappazon wrote:
> Hello Kern,
>
> I've done some new tests with volumes files and I have the good
> behaviour. I don't really understand what happened with the tapes, I
> will test again.
>
> In any case, I think the volumes taken from Scratch Pool shou
Hello Kern,
I've done some new tests with volumes files and I have the good
behaviour. I don't really understand what happened with the tapes, I
will test again.
In any case, I think the volumes taken from Scratch Pool should not only
take the Volume Retention of the new pool, they should also ta
I agree with you about moving 8 before 7.
But from my test, I think that 8 is currently between 3 and 4.
There is something I don't understand : Is there something the 9 can do
that the 4 couldn't ?
(ie : prune oldest is included in prune all, no ?)
Ludovic.
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 28
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Here is the algorithm that Bacula uses to get the next volume (as written in
> the manual):
>
> 1. Search the Pool for a Volume with VolStatus=Append (if there is more
>than one, the Volume with the oldest date last written is chosen. If
>two have the same date then
On Monday 28 November 2005 12:26, Ludovic Strappazon wrote:
> This is maybe more readable :
Yes, thanks, it keeps it all on one line.
So, thanks for the example, this seems pretty clear.
Here is the algorithm that Bacula uses to get the next volume (as written in
the manual):
1. Search the
This is maybe more readable :
I have a pool with two full tapes :
Tape_1|Full|1 week|Recycle=yes|LastWritten=5/11/2005
Tape_2|Full|1 week|Recycle=yes|LastWritten=23/11/2005
And a Scratch Pool with Tape_3.
If I run a job, this is what happen :
Tape_1|Full|1 week|Recycle=yes|LastWritten=5/11/2
Kern Sibbald a écrit :
>On Monday 28 November 2005 09:33, Ludovic Strappazon wrote:
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I've just tried the "Scratch Pool" feature. I'm very happy to have it in
>>Bacula.
>>However, I think there is two problems, unless I'm missing something :
>>
>>- Bacula takes a Scratch Pool vol
