On 01/19/10 21:58, Jon Schewe wrote:
> On 01/18/2010 09:35 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> On 01/15/10 08:48, John Drescher wrote:
>>
>>> I think others were looking for the more complicated task of deleting
>>> file volumes automatically after their retention period had expired.
>>>
>>
>> Ha
On 01/18/2010 09:35 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 01/15/10 08:48, John Drescher wrote:
>
>> I think others were looking for the more complicated task of deleting
>> file volumes automatically after their retention period had expired.
>>
>
> Having now finished the OS reinstallation on my
On 01/15/10 08:48, John Drescher wrote:
> I think others were looking for the more complicated task of deleting
> file volumes automatically after their retention period had expired.
Having now finished the OS reinstallation on my main workstation, I've
had time to look at this problem. Here's m
On 01/15/2010 01:49 PM, Mike Holden wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>
> That's what I intend to do as well by changing the find to be this:
>
> find /mnt/mybook/bacula -mtime +65
>
> This finds all files that haven't been modified in 65 days or more. If
> the retention peri
John Drescher wrote:
That's what I intend to do as well by changing the find to be this:
find /mnt/mybook/bacula -mtime +65
This finds all files that haven't been modified in 65 days or more. If
the retention period is set to 60 days, this would be a pretty safe way
>>
>>> That's what I intend to do as well by changing the find to be this:
>>>
>>> find /mnt/mybook/bacula -mtime +65
>>>
>>> This finds all files that haven't been modified in 65 days or more. If
>>> the retention period is set to 60 days, this would be a pretty safe way
>>> to do it.
>>>
>>
>> Looks
>> I think others were looking for the more complicated task of deleting
>> file volumes automatically after their retention period had expired.
>>
>>
> That's what I intend to do as well by changing the find to be this:
>
> find /mnt/mybook/bacula -mtime +65
>
> This finds all files that haven't b
On 1/15/10 7:48 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>>> I asked this same question recently. There isn't a standard one. I
>>> will be writing one shortly for my own needs.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Turns out it was really easy, I wrote one last night. It's below. You
>> just want to change the find part of the
>> I asked this same question recently. There isn't a standard one. I
>> will be writing one shortly for my own needs.
>>
>>
> Turns out it was really easy, I wrote one last night. It's below. You
> just want to change the find part of the script to find the appropriate
> volumes, then run this a
On 01/14/2010 11:05 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Jon Schewe wrote:
>
>> On 1/12/10 5:40 PM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
>>
So I'm backing data up to an external drive. I have maximum volume jobs
set to 1, to ensure that each job uses a different volume. I would also
like it such tha
Jon Schewe wrote:
> On 1/12/10 5:40 PM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
>>> So I'm backing data up to an external drive. I have maximum volume jobs
>>> set to 1, to ensure that each job uses a different volume. I would also
>>> like it such that volumes are not reused, so I assume I should set
>>> recycle to
On 1/12/10 5:40 PM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
>> So I'm backing data up to an external drive. I have maximum volume jobs
>> set to 1, to ensure that each job uses a different volume. I would also
>> like it such that volumes are not reused, so I assume I should set
>> recycle to no. Now the question is,
> So I'm backing data up to an external drive. I have maximum volume jobs
> set to 1, to ensure that each job uses a different volume. I would also
> like it such that volumes are not reused, so I assume I should set
> recycle to no. Now the question is, when the retention period comes up,
> will t
13 matches
Mail list logo
