Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with usage of Copy Jobs

2010-10-22 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:07:37 +0200, Frank Altpeter said: > > Hi, > > I'm still curious about this because it's still present with the > current 5.0.3 implementation of bacula. Is there anything new about > the behaviour of copy jobs? Any other peopel with ideas to discuss > with? I mean, ge

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with usage of Copy Jobs

2010-10-22 Thread Frank Altpeter
Hi, I'm still curious about this because it's still present with the current 5.0.3 implementation of bacula. Is there anything new about the behaviour of copy jobs? Any other peopel with ideas to discuss with? I mean, generally the copy jobs seem to work, but with almost 140 clients the database g

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with usage of Copy Jobs

2010-07-23 Thread Frank Altpeter
Moin, 2010/7/23  : > That seems strange. I presume you also didn't get a mail for job 54425? Correct. > I also don't know what to make of this. You could check the volumes to see if > there was actually data written for the incremental job. I checked, and it seems that the job did not actually

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with usage of Copy Jobs

2010-07-23 Thread C . Keschnat
That seems strange. I presume you also didn't get a mail for job 54425? I also don't know what to make of this. You could check the volumes to see if there was actually data written for the incremental job. >Moin, > >2010/7/22 : >> I don't see anything wront with it. Can you post >> /etc/bacul

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with usage of Copy Jobs

2010-07-23 Thread Frank Altpeter
Moin, 2010/7/22 : > I don't see anything wront with it. Can you post > /etc/bacula/INCLUDES/schedules.conf ? Sure, but I don't think that it would change anything, because the described behaviour also happens if I comment out the schedule entry and do a manually "run job=DiskToTape yes" on the c

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with usage of Copy Jobs

2010-07-22 Thread C . Keschnat
I don't see anything wront with it. Can you post /etc/bacula/INCLUDES/schedules.conf ? >Hi, > >2010/7/21 : >> Can you post your configuration for the Jobs and Pools? That thing with the >> incremental jobs shouldn't happen. > >Sure, I've anonymized the relevant config files (hopefully all that

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with usage of Copy Jobs

2010-07-21 Thread Frank Altpeter
Hi, 2010/7/21 : > Can you post your configuration for the Jobs and Pools? That thing with the > incremental jobs shouldn't happen. Sure, I've anonymized the relevant config files (hopefully all that is needed) and put it on pastebin here: http://racoon.pastebin.com/E1LurCY7 > As for the "fork

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with usage of Copy Jobs

2010-07-21 Thread C . Keschnat
Can you post your configuration for the Jobs and Pools? That thing with the incremental jobs shouldn't happen. As for the "forking": I have that same issue, every Mail has the same subject but I don't think you can change that (I might be wrong). >Hi list, > >I'm using bacula-5.0.2 with a di