> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:07:37 +0200, Frank Altpeter said:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm still curious about this because it's still present with the
> current 5.0.3 implementation of bacula. Is there anything new about
> the behaviour of copy jobs? Any other peopel with ideas to discuss
> with? I mean, ge
Hi,
I'm still curious about this because it's still present with the
current 5.0.3 implementation of bacula. Is there anything new about
the behaviour of copy jobs? Any other peopel with ideas to discuss
with? I mean, generally the copy jobs seem to work, but with almost
140 clients the database g
Moin,
2010/7/23 :
> That seems strange. I presume you also didn't get a mail for job 54425?
Correct.
> I also don't know what to make of this. You could check the volumes to see if
> there was actually data written for the incremental job.
I checked, and it seems that the job did not actually
That seems strange. I presume you also didn't get a mail for job 54425? I also
don't know what to make of this. You could check the volumes to see if
there was actually data written for the incremental job.
>Moin,
>
>2010/7/22 :
>> I don't see anything wront with it. Can you post
>> /etc/bacul
Moin,
2010/7/22 :
> I don't see anything wront with it. Can you post
> /etc/bacula/INCLUDES/schedules.conf ?
Sure, but I don't think that it would change anything, because the
described behaviour also happens if I comment out the schedule entry
and do a manually "run job=DiskToTape yes" on the c
I don't see anything wront with it. Can you post
/etc/bacula/INCLUDES/schedules.conf ?
>Hi,
>
>2010/7/21 :
>> Can you post your configuration for the Jobs and Pools? That thing with the
>> incremental jobs shouldn't happen.
>
>Sure, I've anonymized the relevant config files (hopefully all that
Hi,
2010/7/21 :
> Can you post your configuration for the Jobs and Pools? That thing with the
> incremental jobs shouldn't happen.
Sure, I've anonymized the relevant config files (hopefully all that is
needed) and put it on pastebin here:
http://racoon.pastebin.com/E1LurCY7
> As for the "fork
Can you post your configuration for the Jobs and Pools? That thing with the
incremental jobs shouldn't happen.
As for the "forking": I have that same issue, every Mail has the same subject
but I don't think you can change that (I might be wrong).
>Hi list,
>
>I'm using bacula-5.0.2 with a di