Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with bat from Bacula 5.2.10

2012-08-17 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: > Zitat von Thomas Lohman : > > "bat ERROR in lib/smartall.c:121 Failed ASSERT: nbytes >0" This particular message is generated because some calling method is passing in a 0 to the SmartAlloc methods as the number of bytes to allocate. This

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with bat from Bacula 5.2.10

2012-08-15 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Thomas Lohman : "bat ERROR in lib/smartall.c:121 Failed ASSERT: nbytes >0" >>> >>> This particular message is generated because some calling method is >>> passing in a 0 to the SmartAlloc methods as the number of bytes to >>> allocate. This is not allowed via an ASSERT condition a

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with bat from Bacula 5.2.10

2012-08-15 Thread Thomas Lohman
>>> "bat ERROR in lib/smartall.c:121 Failed ASSERT: nbytes >0" >> >> This particular message is generated because some calling method is >> passing in a 0 to the SmartAlloc methods as the number of bytes to >> allocate. This is not allowed via an ASSERT condition at the top of the >> actual smallo

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with bat from Bacula 5.2.10

2012-08-15 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Thomas Lohman : >> "bat ERROR in lib/smartall.c:121 Failed ASSERT: nbytes >0" > > This particular message is generated because some calling method is > passing in a 0 to the SmartAlloc methods as the number of bytes to > allocate. This is not allowed via an ASSERT condition at the top

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with bat from Bacula 5.2.10

2012-08-15 Thread Thomas Lohman
> "bat ERROR in lib/smartall.c:121 Failed ASSERT: nbytes >0" This particular message is generated because some calling method is passing in a 0 to the SmartAlloc methods as the number of bytes to allocate. This is not allowed via an ASSERT condition at the top of the actual smalloc() method in