Re: [Bacula-users] Problem for Restore after bscan

2019-10-02 Thread Jose Alberto
Hi. The Tape is only one. I Test restore one file of 400MB. Late 30Minutes. speed 250KB/S). But other Restore (same file other Job: Before jobid 70, after bscan jobid100) in the same volume speed (40MB/S). Late 1Minute. of the 7 Job. Only the first is speed. the others are late

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem for Restore after bscan

2019-09-27 Thread Jose Alberto
I need to validate if a job that is on the main tape is finished running on another tape. I verify it on Monday. On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:16 PM Martin Simmons wrote: > I think restore after bscan can be very slow. How long did you wait? > > __Martin > > > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:21:38 -0

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem for Restore after bscan

2019-09-26 Thread Martin Simmons
I think restore after bscan can be very slow. How long did you wait? __Martin > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:21:38 -0400, Jose Alberto said: > > Hi. > > I have Bacula 9 on Debian with Postgres. > > The problem, for error, the sysadmin delete (prune and purge), 6 job > (example jobid 10,20,30,