Re: [Bacula-users] Priority Problem / Question

2012-11-08 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 12:53:38PM +0100, Adrian Reyer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 12:53:43PM +0100, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > > to reasonable levels (dumping the db through a gzip --fast would take > > five hours or so while an rsync takes only roughly 30 minutes, > > including lzop compression

Re: [Bacula-users] Priority Problem / Question

2012-11-07 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 04:15:18PM +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: > > from my knowledge the jobs are created but take on hold as long as > other jobs with different priority are running. So it looks like the > catalog connections are established as part of the job creation. That > said yo

Re: [Bacula-users] Priority Problem / Question

2012-11-06 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Uwe Schuerkamp : > Hi folks, > > I'm having a problem understanding job priorities. We don't allow > mixed jobs to run concurrently, so based on that I've set up my > catalog backup at the lowest priority (25) while regular backups run > at 10, some at prio 15 to assure the catalog back