John Drescher wrote:
>>> Wait a minute. Are you sending emails after each job?
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>> Ahhh... Maybe. It's the default dir.conf that I only modified a little for
>> testing. However this is in the dir.conf:
>>
>>
>>
> Recently I have seen users on this list having pro
>> Wait a minute. Are you sending emails after each job?
>>
>> John
>>
>
> Ahhh... Maybe. It's the default dir.conf that I only modified a little for
> testing. However this is in the dir.conf:
>
>
Recently I have seen users on this list having problems where emailing
was causing this type of ha
John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Drew Tomlinson
> wrote:
>
>> John Drescher wrote:
>>
The particular instance has been running for 105 minutes. However I've
let
jobs run for over 8 hours and they still never finished.
The fileset for this te
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>>>
>>> The particular instance has been running for 105 minutes. However I've
>>> let
>>> jobs run for over 8 hours and they still never finished.
>>>
>>> The fileset for this test backup is just /etc/bacula which total
John Drescher wrote:
>> The particular instance has been running for 105 minutes. However I've let
>> jobs run for over 8 hours and they still never finished.
>>
>> The fileset for this test backup is just /etc/bacula which totals about 18K.
>> When I run the first backup that completes, it only
Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Drew Tomlinson
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'm using bacula 3.0.3 that was compiled on a Gentoo distribution using
>>> its portage system. The director, storage, and file daemons are all
>>> running on this sam
> The particular instance has been running for 105 minutes. However I've let
> jobs run for over 8 hours and they still never finished.
>
> The fileset for this test backup is just /etc/bacula which totals about 18K.
> When I run the first backup that completes, it only takes about 10 seconds
> t
John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Drew Tomlinson
> wrote:
>
>> I'm using bacula 3.0.3 that was compiled on a Gentoo distribution using
>> its portage system. The director, storage, and file daemons are all
>> running on this same system.
>>
>> Bacula works fine for one b
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> I'm using bacula 3.0.3 that was compiled on a Gentoo distribution using
> its portage system. The director, storage, and file daemons are all
> running on this same system.
>
> Bacula works fine for one backup. However any subsequent backu
