Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-04-02 Thread Alan Brown
On 30/03/12 09:39, Alex Crow wrote: > We tried removing the compression on some jobs, and we got a great speed > boost. However, the SSL compression was either absent or minimal, even > though OpenSSL libs are compiled with zlib: They probably use Z0 or Z1 for best speed. if that's the case the

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-30 Thread Alex Crow
On 05/03/12 21:37, Alan Brown wrote: > On 05/03/12 19:51, Alex Crow wrote: > >> Thanks Alan, >> >> I am specifically addressing the encryption support within Bacula: >> >> http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/Data_Encryption.html > Openssl compresses _if_ compiled with zlib (it usually is)

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-29 Thread Pierre Bernhardt
Am 05.03.2012 15:28, schrieb Kleber l: > 2012/3/5 Gael Guilmin >> On 05/03/12 14:00, Gael Guilmin wrote: >>> I'd like to know if there is a way to allow the use of multi-cores >> during a backup and especially for the compression of the data? >> >> Why do you want compression? > No, you dont n

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-07 Thread Clark, Patricia A.
The software (bacula in this case) is not involved with managing the keys in hardware encryption. It is managed by other software or by the tape library itself. I came from a Networker environment using LTO-4 and encryption. In that specific case, Quantum has their own key manager (a relabel of

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-07 Thread Martin Simmons
How does the software specify the encryption key? I read that it needs specific SCSI commands, which Bacula doesn't send. __Martin > On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 14:12:47 -0500, Clark, Patricia A said: > > Why would bacula care about hardware LTO encryption? It's transparent to > the software. > >

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-06 Thread Clark, Patricia A.
Why would bacula care about hardware LTO encryption? It's transparent to the software. Patti Clark Sr. Linux System Administrator On 3/6/12 10:14 AM, "Jeremy Maes" wrote: >Op 5/03/2012 22:37, Alan Brown schreef: >> On 05/03/12 19:51, Alex Crow wrote: >> >>> Thanks Alan, >>> >>> I am specific

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-06 Thread Jeremy Maes
Op 5/03/2012 22:37, Alan Brown schreef: > On 05/03/12 19:51, Alex Crow wrote: > >> Thanks Alan, >> >> I am specifically addressing the encryption support within Bacula: >> >> http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/Data_Encryption.html > Openssl compresses _if_ compiled with zlib (it usually

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-06 Thread John Drescher
> I thought about that, and so I'm wondering if it's really useful to use an > MD5/SHA1 signature? > I think its very useful. I use that on all of my backups or ~40TB. This allows verification that the tapes are consistent and you can also compare that what is on the filesystem matches the hashes

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-06 Thread Gael Guilmin
cula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression Ok I didn't know that. Thank you for your help! Gael -Original Message- From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 3:30 PM To: Gael Guilmin Cc: Alan Brown; bacula-users@lists.

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-05 Thread Alan Brown
On 05/03/12 19:51, Alex Crow wrote: > Thanks Alan, > > I am specifically addressing the encryption support within Bacula: > > http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/Data_Encryption.html Openssl compresses _if_ compiled with zlib (it usually is) It's not hard to test, write to a file ins

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-05 Thread Alex Crow
>> >> What about when you are encrypting? You have to do the compression in >> Bacula as once you've encrypted the data it can no longer be compressed >> by the drive (eg for LTO < LTO4 where the drive cannot encrypt.) > > Encryption programs generally compress as well in order to increase > entr

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-05 Thread Alan Brown
On 05/03/12 15:08, Alex Crow wrote: > On 05/03/12 14:45, Alan Brown wrote: >> On 05/03/12 14:24, Gael Guilmin wrote: >>> To gain space on the LT0. >> Don't bother. >> >> 1: Compression maxes out at about 30MB/s >> >> 2: LTO has inbuilt hardware compression which is "good enough" and a >> _LOT_ fast

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-05 Thread Josh Fisher
On 3/5/2012 9:45 AM, Alan Brown wrote: > On 05/03/12 14:24, Gael Guilmin wrote: >> To gain space on the LT0. > Don't bother. > > 1: Compression maxes out at about 30MB/s > > 2: LTO has inbuilt hardware compression which is "good enough" and a > _LOT_ faster than any CPU you can throw at the task.

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-05 Thread Gael Guilmin
Ok I didn't know that. Thank you for your help! Gael -Original Message- From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 3:30 PM To: Gael Guilmin Cc: Alan Brown; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression O

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-05 Thread Alan Brown
To: Gael Guilmin > Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression > > On 05/03/12 14:00, Gael Guilmin wrote: >> Hello, >> I'd like to know if there is a way to allow the use of multi-cores during a >> backup and espec

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-05 Thread John Drescher
> Thanks for the answer. > When you say "at the moment", you mean that in the future it'll? > Possibly. This is covered by a few planned projects. http://bacula.org/en/?page=feature-request http://www.bacula.org/git/cgit.cgi/bacula/plain/bacula/projects?h=Branch-5.2 John ---

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-05 Thread John Drescher
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Gael Guilmin wrote: > To gain space on the LT0. > You mean tape. Do not use bacula compression with tape. The HW does compression automatically and it is much faster. John -- Try before y

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-05 Thread Kleber Leal
wn [mailto:a...@mssl.ucl.ac.uk] > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 3:33 PM > To: Gael Guilmin > Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression > > On 05/03/12 14:00, Gael Guilmin wrote: > > Hello, > > I'd like to know if

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-05 Thread Craig Van Tassle
From: Alan Brown [mailto:a...@mssl.ucl.ac.uk] > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 3:33 PM > To: Gael Guilmin > Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression > > On 05/03/12 14:00, Gael Guilmin wrote: > > Hello, > > I'd like

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-05 Thread Gael Guilmin
To gain space on the LT0. -Original Message- From: Alan Brown [mailto:a...@mssl.ucl.ac.uk] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 3:33 PM To: Gael Guilmin Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression On 05/03/12 14:00, Gael Guilmin wrote: > He

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-05 Thread Alan Brown
On 05/03/12 14:00, Gael Guilmin wrote: > Hello, > I'd like to know if there is a way to allow the use of multi-cores during a > backup and especially for the compression of the data? Why do you want compression? -- Tr

Re: [Bacula-users] Multi-cores compression

2012-03-05 Thread John Drescher
> I’d like to know if there is a way to allow the use of multi-cores during a > backup and especially for the compression of the data? > I do not believe this is available in bacula at the moment. However you may be able to turn compression off and use a filesystem that supports compression like b