Re: [Bacula-users] Low performance with file daemon version 11.0.5

2021-12-07 Thread Departamento de Informática - PMI
Hello everyone Thanks so much for the explanations Eric. As a workaround, I will update the file daemon before the next full backup. Márcio Em 07/12/2021 05:52, Eric Bollengier via Bacula-users escreveu: Hello Marcio, On 12/6/21 19:24, Márcio (Departamento de Informática - PMI) wrote: Hello

Re: [Bacula-users] Low performance with file daemon version 11.0.5

2021-12-07 Thread Departamento de Informática - PMI
Prefeitura Municipal de Indaiatuba Telefone: (19) 3834-9000 Site: http://www.indaiatuba.sp.gov.br/ Antes de imprimir pense no seu compromisso com o meio ambiente. ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://list

Re: [Bacula-users] Low performance with file daemon version 11.0.5

2021-12-07 Thread Eric Bollengier via Bacula-users
Hello Marcio, On 12/6/21 19:24, Márcio (Departamento de Informática - PMI) wrote: Hello everyone Investigating a little more about what might be happening, I compared the records (from the Bacula catalog in the database) of a file that was backed up by 9.6.7 and 11.0.5, without having changed

Re: [Bacula-users] Low performance with file daemon version 11.0.5

2021-12-07 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, pon., 6 gru 2021 o 12:59 Márcio (Departamento de Informática - PMI) < marcio.mendo...@indaiatuba.sp.gov.br> napisał(a): > > Here is a question: is there a way to enable a DEBUG level, on the > client or on the director, to try to understand what is happening? > > You can run client or dire

Re: [Bacula-users] Low performance with file daemon version 11.0.5

2021-12-06 Thread Departamento de Informática - PMI
Hello everyone Investigating a little more about what might be happening, I compared the records (from the Bacula catalog in the database) of a file that was backed up by 9.6.7 and 11.0.5, without having changed during these two jobs . I noticed that the "lstat" field of the "filename" table i

Re: [Bacula-users] Low performance with file daemon version 11.0.5

2021-12-06 Thread Departamento de Informática - PMI
Greetings everyone The issue of disabling TLS didn't resolve the issue, but after the FULL backup ran last weekend, the Differential backup's performance returned to the time it used to take. Initially I thought that this happened because, at the time of removing the file daemon from the previ

Re: [Bacula-users] Low performance with file daemon version 11.0.5

2021-12-02 Thread Departamento de Informática - PMI
Hi! Bill, following your tip I enabled the following directives, both in the director and the client:    TLS Enable = no    TLS PSK Enable = no    TLS Require = no I'll wait for the backup to run tonight and I'll let you know the result later. Thank you for your help. Márcio Em 02/12/2021

Re: [Bacula-users] Low performance with file daemon version 11.0.5

2021-12-02 Thread Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users
On 12/2/21 05:12, Márcio wrote: > Greetings everyone > > I recently updated the file daemon version on two Windows Server 2019 > clients from version 9.6.7 to version 11.0.5. > In both I noticed that the backup performance dropped, making the job > take longer to finish. > I noticed that the rate (