> I come back with something with I've found, the server where the SD resides
> has 2 jobs. One runs really slow, it backus mainly small files, while
> another one on the same machine with bigger files runs at rates around 20
> times faster! Could it the cause? I mean, the bunch of small files?
>
>
On 04/12/2013 02:21 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi guys,
I come back with something with I've found, the server where the SD
resides has 2 jobs. One runs really slow, it backus mainly small
files, while another one on the same machine with bigger files runs at
rates around 20 times faster! Could
Hi guys,
I come back with something with I've found, the server where the SD resides
has 2 jobs. One runs really slow, it backus mainly small files, while
another one on the same machine with bigger files runs at rates around 20
times faster! Could it the cause? I mean, the bunch of small files?
> I've added Data Spool in a job resource and the following options to
> Storage Device resource :
>
> Maximum Spool Size = 10gb
> Maximum Job Spool Size = 5gb
> Spool Directory = /extra/bacula_spool
>Fast Forward Space File = yes
> Maximum Block Size = 262144
> Maximum Network Buffer S
2013/3/14 John Drescher :
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> The performance is very poor, its around 6MB/s !!!
>> The tape device is an IBM ULT3580-HH5
>>
>> Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
>> Vendor: IBM Model: ULT3580-HH5 Rev: BBN3
>>
mentioned before disk spooling will also eliminate the network bottleneck issue.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] LTO5 performance
From: Carsten Jensen <to...@tomse.dk>
Date: Thu, March 14, 2013 2:04 pm
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
On 03/14/2013 08:32 PM
On 03/14/2013 08:32 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> The performance is very poor, its around 6MB/s !!!
>> The tape device is an IBM ULT3580-HH5
>>
>> Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
>>Vendor: IBM Model: ULT3580-HH5
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The performance is very poor, its around 6MB/s !!!
> The tape device is an IBM ULT3580-HH5
>
> Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> Vendor: IBM Model: ULT3580-HH5 Rev: BBN3
> Type: Sequential-Access
