Mandi! Heitor Faria
In chel di` si favelave...
> You can use the btape speed test to verify the best values.
I've just done some btape tests with block size and file size, using block
size of 512K, 1M and 2M, but found that there's litle or no differences over
1M, so i can confirm the 'paper' y
On 20/05/2024 21:35, Heitor Faria wrote:
Hello Marco,
> i have:
> Maximum blocksize = 512K
I usually don't like setting fixed block sizes, but letting Bacula
determine. But Maximum Block Size = 1 MB or even a little bit more
should be safe for LTO-9.
https://www.bacula.lat/otimizando-a-v
Hello Marco,
> i have:
> Maximum blocksize = 512K
I usually don't like setting fixed block sizes, but letting Bacula determine.
But Maximum Block Size = 1 MB or even a little bit more should be safe for
LTO-9.
https://www.bacula.lat/otimizando-a-velocidade-de-fitas/
https://www.bareos.com
Mandi! Cejka Rudolf via Bacula-users
In chel di` si favelave...
> - Spool Data = yes, attribute spooling is automatically enabled too
Done.
> In device storage section:
> - Maximum File Size = 32 GB, for LTO-6 and older you can think about 16 GB
i have:
Maximum File Size = 50G
> - Su
Mandi! Marco Gaiarin
In chel di` si favelave...
> I'll provide feedback. Thanks.
Better, reached 180MB/s.
Probably i need to move bacula spool on a dedicated SSD disk (currently, on
an ZFS RAID pool, backed up with an SSD read cache) to reach better
performaces.
Still incremental are very sl
Hello, you need all of these:
In job director section:
- Spool Data = yes, attribute spooling is automatically enabled too
In device storage section:
- Maximum File Size = 32 GB, for LTO-6 and older you can think about 16 GB
- Sufficient Maximum Job Spool Size or Maximum Spool Size, so overall
Mandi! Josh Fisher via Bacula-users
In chel di` si favelave...
> Disk that is local to the server does not mean it is local to the
> bacula-sd process or tape drive. If the connection is 1 gigabit
> Ethernet, then max rate is going to be 125 MB/s.
Nono, i meant literally 'local disk': i'm put
On 1/24/24 12:48, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
My new IBM LTO9 tape unit have a data sheet performace of:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/it/ts4500-tape-library/1.10.0?topic=performance-lto-specifications
so on worst case (compression disabled) seems to perform 400 MB/s on an LTO9
tape.
Practicall
Am 25.01.24 um 10:06 schrieb Marco Gaiarin:
2) checked disk performance (data came only from local disk); i've currently
3 servers, some perform better, some worster, but the best one have a read
disk performance pretty decent, at least 200MB/s on random access (1500 MB/s
on sequential one).
> 2) checked disk performance (data came only from local disk); i've currently
> 3 servers, some perform better, some worster, but the best one have a read
> disk performance pretty decent, at least 200MB/s on random access (1500 MB/s
> on sequential one).
Jim Pollard on private email ask me ab
10 matches
Mail list logo
