On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:44:06AM +0200, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
>
> So, should I set schedule time for this job one minute less than
> others ?
>
This could help, or simply define a completely separate infrastructure
for this job (Device, Storage and Pool(s)).
Cheers, Uwe
Am 05.07.2012 11:44, schrieb Gandalf Corvotempesta:
> Il giorno gio, 05/07/2012 alle 11.32 +0200, Mario Moder ha scritto:
>> If one job must finish before another starts, you should use lower
>> priorities (higher numbers) for the "later" jobs as you already tried.
>>
>> If the jobs should only _st
Il giorno gio, 05/07/2012 alle 11.32 +0200, Mario Moder ha scritto:
> If one job must finish before another starts, you should use lower
> priorities (higher numbers) for the "later" jobs as you already tried.
>
> If the jobs should only _start_ in a specific order, no matter when they
> finish
Am 05.07.2012 10:37, schrieb Gandalf Corvotempesta:
> hi,
> I have a bounch of job with same priority.
> Is possibile to set a running order within the same priority?
> I've tryied to increase the priority for specific job but in
> this way, all other jobs must wait for it to finish.
That depends
