> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:39:36 +0200, Andreas Koch said:
>
> Martin Simmons wrote:
> >
> > Maybe the Volume Retention is set in the volumes, so they were pruned? This
> > prunes the jobs too.
> >
> > __Martin
>
> No, the Volume Retention is set much longer, too:
>
> +-+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Simmons wrote:
>
> Maybe the Volume Retention is set in the volumes, so they were pruned? This
> prunes the jobs too.
>
> __Martin
No, the Volume Retention is set much longer, too:
+-+--+---+--+---
> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:47:51 +0200, Klavs Klavsen said:
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> You could try to update volume parameters on the volumes used for full
> backup - perhaps the volumes were created before you defined the File
> retention of 60 days - and it's one of the parameters that are stored
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Klavs Klavsen wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> You could try to update volume parameters on the volumes used for full
> backup - perhaps the volumes were created before you defined the File
> retention of 60 days - and it's one of the parameters that are stor
> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:55:11 +0200, Andreas Koch said:
>
> Hi all,
>
> we've been relying on Bacula for quite a while now and are very
> satisfied users. However, I just noticed a strangeness with regard to
> Job Retention on 1.38.9:
>
> It appears to be obeyed only for our differential ba
Hi Andreas,
You could try to update volume parameters on the volumes used for full
backup - perhaps the volumes were created before you defined the File
retention of 60 days - and it's one of the parameters that are stored on
the volume itself (my bacula server is currently unavailable - so I
can'
