Re: [Bacula-users] How precisely does bacula decide what to archive

2013-02-22 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:39:07 +, Durand Toto said: > > > > IN ACCURATE MODE, I cannot keep a DB of all the files ever archived > > > as > > > the DB would grow to a TB (10^5 to 10^6 new files/day). > > > > No, that doesn't happen. Not every revision of every file is kept. > > Forever. > >

Re: [Bacula-users] How precisely does bacula decide what to archive

2013-02-22 Thread Josh Fisher
On 2/21/2013 7:39 AM, Durand Toto wrote: > Hi all, > > First of all, thanks once more Dan. > > > Hi, > > > > Im trying to use bacula but for space reasons I can only do > > incremental backups so I need to make sure that I archive > everything. > > > > I see two alterna

Re: [Bacula-users] How precisely does bacula decide what to archive

2013-02-21 Thread Durand Toto
Hi all, First of all, thanks once more Dan. > Hi, > > > > Im trying to use bacula but for space reasons I can only do > > incremental backups so I need to make sure that I archive everything. > > > > I see two alternatives: > > * Bacula in normal mode ensuring that all files are considered >

Re: [Bacula-users] How precisely does bacula decide what to archive

2013-02-15 Thread Dan Langille
On 2013-02-15 06:23, Durand Toto wrote: > Hi, > > Im trying to use bacula but for space reasons I can only do > incremental backups so I need to make sure that I archive everything. > > I see two alternatives: >     * Bacula in normal mode ensuring that all files are considered > new (settting ctim