> Why? Bacula doesn't use the atime when deciding about backups.
>
I stand corrected.
John
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:37:31 -0500, John Drescher said:
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Rainer Koenig
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Arno,
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2008 12:03 schrieb Arno Lehmann:
> >
> >
> > > What it comes down to is that you need to know why the acce
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Rainer Koenig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Arno,
>
> Am Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2008 12:03 schrieb Arno Lehmann:
>
>
> > What it comes down to is that you need to know why the access times
> > of the directories are modified. Virus scanners are known to do thi
Rainer Koenig wrote:
> Hi Arno,
>
> Am Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2008 12:03 schrieb Arno Lehmann:
>
>> What it comes down to is that you need to know why the access times
>> of the directories are modified. Virus scanners are known to do this
>> sometimes, but actually, any process could.
>
> Yes,
Hi Arno,
Am Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2008 12:03 schrieb Arno Lehmann:
> What it comes down to is that you need to know why the access times
> of the directories are modified. Virus scanners are known to do this
> sometimes, but actually, any process could.
Yes, I had also clamav installed due to
Hi,
21.02.2008 11:29, Rainer Koenig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running bacula 2.2.8 form Debian backports org on an Etch server.
> There is also my desktop which runs the bacula-fd to be backed up every
> day at 10 o'clock.
> The schedule is monday to thursday: incremental backup. Friday: full.
>
>
