Maybe this confusion could have been avoided if there wouldn't be
"anonymous" written in the manual - because it indeed is not "anonymous"
as such :)
--
Silver
On 18.12.2015 18:34, H. Steuer wrote:
Hello Bill,
you are right, but there is a serious side effect. Heres a statement
from the Ba
Hello Heri,
Maybe the misunderstanding here is because in bacula-fd.conf the client's
password used for communicating with director is in a director resource.
All the daemons (clients and storages daemons) have their own passwords for
communicating with director, not for communicating with bconsol
> On 12/18/2015 06:46 PM, H. Steuer wrote:
>> Hello Kern,
>> thanks for your comment. Probably I did not understand the security model of
>> Bacula so far. Furthermore, you misread my
>> post. The point is not anybody having root access to the Bacula server -
>> thats
>> absolutely not the case.
On 12/18/2015 06:46 PM, H. Steuer
wrote:
Hello Kern,
thanks for your comment. Probably I did not understand the
security model of Bacula so far. Furthermore, you misread my
post. The point is not anybody having root access to
On 18/12/15 18:01, H. Steuer wrote:
>
> In fact the whole discussion breaks down to a very simple question:
> /
> //Is the director password thats stored in the file daemon
> configuration on a client machine the same password that gains me
> administrative access to the director using bconsole./
>
On 18.12.2015 18:01, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 12/18/15 11:56, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> If you have hundreds of users with root access and they can access the
>> Bacula Director machine as root, you have a far bigger security problem
>> than just Bacula, since they can do anything to y
Hello Kern,
thanks for your comment. Probably I did not understand the security
model of Bacula so far. Furthermore, you misread my
post. The point is not anybody having root access to the Bacula server -
thats absolutely not the case. And there are just very few users with
root access on servers.
On 12/18/15 11:56, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If you have hundreds of users with root access and they can access the
> Bacula Director machine as root, you have a far bigger security problem
> than just Bacula, since they can do anything to your machines and the
> Bacula Director machine, an
Hello,
If you have hundreds of users with root access and they can access
the Bacula Director machine as root, you have a far bigger
security problem than just Bacula, since they can do anything to
your machines and the Bacula Director machine, and there is
On 12/18/15 11:34, H. Steuer wrote:
>
> Hello Bill,
>
> you are right, but there is a serious side effect. Heres a statement
> from the Bacula docs:
>
>
> The first console type is an anonymous or default console, which
> has full privileges. There is no console resource necessary f
10 matches
Mail list logo
