Re: [Bacula-users] ERROR: integer out of range

2005-09-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
nal Message- > From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 11:35 AM > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: Graham David Purcocks M.A.(Oxon.); Anthony Dodson > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] ERROR: integer out of range > > On Frida

RE: [Bacula-users] ERROR: integer out of range

2005-09-26 Thread Anthony Dodson
@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Graham David Purcocks M.A.(Oxon.); Anthony Dodson Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] ERROR: integer out of range On Friday 23 September 2005 16:35, Graham David Purcocks M.A.(Oxon.) wrote: > Isn't it the NumVols field? this is bigger than an int32. > > Question is why would NumVo

Re: [Bacula-users] ERROR: integer out of range

2005-09-23 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 23 September 2005 16:35, Graham David Purcocks M.A.(Oxon.) wrote: > Isn't it the NumVols field? this is bigger than an int32. > > Question is why would NumVols be that big? It looks like Bacula decremented it when it was already zero, giving -1 or a very large positive number depending

Re: [Bacula-users] ERROR: integer out of range

2005-09-23 Thread Graham David Purcocks M.A.(Oxon.)
Isn't it the NumVols field? this is bigger than an int32. Question is why would NumVols be that big? On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 15:15, Anthony Dodson wrote: > Hello all: > > I had an installation running 1.34 for a long time using a PostgreSQL > database. I recently upgraded to 1.36. Backups seem