On Wednesday 07 February 2007 12:15, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, David Romerstein wrote:
> > That, in essence, is why I first installed bacula - to backup roughly 2TB
> > of data just once (my file count is *significantly* higher than yours,
> > though - on the order of 200 million file
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, David Romerstein wrote:
> That, in essence, is why I first installed bacula - to backup roughly 2TB
> of data just once (my file count is *significantly* higher than yours,
> though - on the order of 200 million files across 10s of thousands of
> directories).
For what it's wo
> I see no problem with what you describe. I would recommend, only,
> performing
> more than one backup, or duplicating your tape(s) after the backup, so that
> you have more than one copy of your files, possibly stored in different
> locations.
>
Agreed. I would not trust my data (medical
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 09:57, David Romerstein wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I want to backup a larger amount of data (approx. 800GB and a total of 2
> > million files) with a library of Ultrium-3 tapes.
>
> That, in essence, is why I first installed bacula - to bac
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I want to backup a larger amount of data (approx. 800GB and a total of 2
> million files) with
> a library of Ultrium-3 tapes.
That, in essence, is why I first installed bacula - to backup roughly 2TB
of data just once (my file count is *significan
