Piotr Gbyliczek wrote:
> On Sunday 14 December 2008 04:52:50 Devin Reade wrote:
>
>> If you have clients that are not on the same network as one of the
>> SD interfaces (or if you have clients with dumb resolvers that won't
>> do result record sorting based on connected interfaces), then you may
On Sunday 14 December 2008 04:52:50 Devin Reade wrote:
> I assume that NAT is not part of the picture?
No, there's no NAT.
> If I understand your topology correctly, it is analagous to my own
> where my SD is multi-homed to take advantage of the switched 1GB
> backbone without saturating the rou
Piotr Gbyliczek wrote:
> I'm having problem with configuring bacula properly. We have one director,
> three storages and lot of clients. Clients are in different networks, so we
> need to use different IP to connect from client to storage and different IP
> to connect from director to storage.
On Thursday 11 December 2008 13:10:14 you wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:43:47 +, Piotr Gbyliczek wrote:
> > We have one director,
> > three storages and lot of clients. Clients are in different networks, so
> > we need to use different IP to connect from client to storage and
> > different IP
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:43:47 +, Piotr Gbyliczek wrote:
> We have one director,
> three storages and lot of clients. Clients are in different networks, so we
> need to use different IP to connect from client to storage and different IP
> to connect from director to storage.
Why is that? In a
