schrieb Harald Schmalzbauer am 10.07.2011 16:28 (localtime):
> schrieb Adrian Reyer am 10.07.2011 15:58 (localtime):
> ...
>> I found using Spool Data for copy jobs to be faster for my setup. I have
>> fast local disks for spooling, but some of my disk storage is accessed
>> vie iSCSI on 1-GBit/s-l
schrieb Adrian Reyer am 10.07.2011 15:58 (localtime):
...
> I found using Spool Data for copy jobs to be faster for my setup. I have
> fast local disks for spooling, but some of my disk storage is accessed
> vie iSCSI on 1-GBit/s-links.
> However, I am currently running a few copy jobs and the limi
Hi Harry,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 03:39:36PM +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> The server is at remote site, so I can't hear any mechanicals, but I
> guess "at rest" means stop, thus my worries about extensive repositioning.
Sorry, I am no expert on drives and only use bacula my very self for 6
schrieb Adrian Reyer am 10.07.2011 14:43 (localtime):
> Hi Harry,
>
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:38:52PM +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
>> of a average transfer rate of 65MB/s makes me worrying about massive
>> repositioning.
>
> AFAIK LTO-Drives have adaptive speeds compared to older technolo
Hi Harry,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:38:52PM +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> of a average transfer rate of 65MB/s makes me worrying about massive
> repositioning.
AFAIK LTO-Drives have adaptive speeds compared to older technologies. If
the data comes in slower, the drive will just run slower
