Thank you for the explanation. In the status output from the storage
device I could see the despool_wait.
@Patti: Thank you also for your very good explanation.
Best Regards,
- Jummo
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012, Alan Brown wrote:
> On 09/08/12 09:27, Jummo wrote:
>> During the backup one copy job
On 09/08/12 09:27, Jummo wrote:
> During the backup one copy job already run and use the first tape drive.
> In the output I can see that 4 Jobs runs concurrently (one was the copy
> job). A little bit later I noticed that 2 jobs despooling data at the same
> time. Will this means the jobs are mixe
On 8/9/12 10:18 AM, "Jummo" wrote:
>Hi Patti,
>
>On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Clark, Patricia A. wrote:
>
>> I have had multiple jobs assigned to the same tape drive. If there is
>> space and none of the thresholds have been reached, the spooling jobs do
>> continue their spooling. If a job B is ready
Hi Patti,
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Clark, Patricia A. wrote:
> I have had multiple jobs assigned to the same tape drive. If there is
> space and none of the thresholds have been reached, the spooling jobs do
> continue their spooling. If a job B is ready to despool to tape and job A
> is despooling,
On 8/9/12 8:28 AM, "John Drescher" wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Jummo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, John Drescher wrote:
>>
During the backup one copy job already run and use the first tape
drive.
In the output I can see that 4 Jobs runs concurrently (one was the
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Jummo wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, John Drescher wrote:
>
>>> During the backup one copy job already run and use the first tape drive.
>>> In the output I can see that 4 Jobs runs concurrently (one was the copy
>>> job). A little bit later I noticed that 2 jobs
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Jummo wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, John Drescher wrote:
>
>>> During the backup one copy job already run and use the first tape drive.
>>> In the output I can see that 4 Jobs runs concurrently (one was the copy
>>> job). A little bit later I noticed that 2 jobs
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, John Drescher wrote:
>> During the backup one copy job already run and use the first tape drive.
>> In the output I can see that 4 Jobs runs concurrently (one was the copy
>> job). A little bit later I noticed that 2 jobs despooling data at the same
>> time. Will this means t
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Jummo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One more question about Data Spooling and Concurrent Jobs.
>
> I have one autochanger with two tape drives. I have set Maximum Concurrent
> Jobs in the Director Resource to 4, the Maximum Concurrent Jobs in the
> Storage Resource of the bacula
