On 31-07-2024 14:54, Kees Bakker via Bacula-users wrote:
On 31-07-2024 14:31, Marcin Haba wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 at 14:08, Kees Bakker wrote:
I have now enabled Config. Two problems:
1. On the Director details page, it does not show the "Configure
director" tab.
Hello Kees,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 at 15:20, Kees Bakker wrote:
> That was already done. "Test configuration" marks all sections with OK.
>
> Something is working, because I can see the Storage configuration. Client
> configurations are visible too, except they all show the data from the one
> FD Client.
> Howe
On 31-07-2024 14:31, Marcin Haba wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 at 14:08, Kees Bakker wrote:
I have now enabled Config. Two problems:
1. On the Director details page, it does not show the "Configure
director" tab.
Hello Kees,
Hi Marcin,
To have the configuration function enabled,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 at 14:08, Kees Bakker wrote:
>
> I have now enabled Config. Two problems:
>
> 1. On the Director details page, it does not show the "Configure director"
> tab.
>
Hello Kees,
To have the configuration function enabled, this config capability needs to
be enabled in the API. It
On 31-07-2024 12:21, Marcin Haba wrote:
Hello Kees,
[...]
For the configuration part, Bacularis has an option to use Bacula
configs in read-only mode for all or for selected Bacula resources and
Bacula components. If you are interested in, you can see it on this
video guide:
https://www.you
On 31-07-2024 12:21, Marcin Haba wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 at 11:36, Kees Bakker via Bacula-users
wrote:
Hi,
It seems that Bacularis has port 9097 hardcoded somewhere.
I've setup Apache to do Bacularis. But not with the supplied
example of using port 9097. I'm just using por
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 at 11:36, Kees Bakker via Bacula-users <
bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that Bacularis has port 9097 hardcoded somewhere.
>
> I've setup Apache to do Bacularis. But not with the supplied example of
> using port 9097. I'm just using port 433 with a
