Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula windows backup really slow

2020-12-16 Thread Satvinder Singh
Tried that on the latest kernel but no change. So reverted back. Satvinder Singh / Operations Manager ssi...@celerium.com / Cell: 703-989-8030 Celerium Office: 703-418-6315 www.celerium.com

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula windows backup really slow

2020-12-16 Thread Satvinder Singh
You disabled on the bacula VM? I tried on th windows VMs but that didn’t help. Satvinder Singh / Operations Manager ssi...@celerium.com / Cell: 703-989-8030 Celerium Office: 703-418-6315 www.celerium.com

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula windows backup really slow

2020-12-16 Thread Josh Fisher
On 12/16/20 9:12 AM, Satvinder Singh wrote: You disabled on the bacula VM? I tried on th windows VMs but that didn’t help. Yes. On the interface used by bacula-sd. Satvinder Singh / Operations Manager ssi...@celerium.com / Cell: 703-989-8030 Celer

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula windows backup really slow

2020-12-16 Thread Josh Fisher
The same happened to me. I posted here on August 5 about debugging it. I believe it to be a bug in virtio-net or in the bridge code that can in some cases cause failures when a physical NIC (or at least igb driver) with some combination of offloading enabled is attached to the same bridge as a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula windows backup really slow

2020-12-16 Thread Satvinder Singh
HI what I ended up doing was rolling back to a previous kernel version on Bacula VM and that resolved the issue, still trying to figure out what in the kernel update could have caused the issue. Thanks Satvinder Singh / Operations Manager ssi...@celerium.

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula windows backup really slow

2020-12-16 Thread Josh Fisher
I'm late answering this, but I suggest trying again with some TCP offloading features disabled on the interface used by SD. /sbin/ethtool -K ethX tso off gso off gro off There are indeed buggy drivers that fail to properly support the (virtual?) hardware offload features, including at least so