Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula tape format vs. rsync on deduplicated file systems

2010-05-28 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 05/28/10 14:04, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > When you patch your servers, do you have to redo your base at the same > time to keep it synced? I don't think so, though if it's a major update, you would probably want to do so. On the "reference client", it should be handled just like any other increm

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula tape format vs. rsync on deduplicated file systems

2010-05-28 Thread Robert LeBlanc
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 05/28/10 13:24, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > > I agree, I haven't looked into BaseJobs yet because they are not the > > easiest thing to understand. Since I've very pressed for time, I don't > > have a lot of time to commit to reading. I pla

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula tape format vs. rsync on deduplicated file systems

2010-05-28 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 05/28/10 13:24, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > I agree, I haven't looked into BaseJobs yet because they are not the > easiest thing to understand. Since I've very pressed for time, I don't > have a lot of time to commit to reading. I plan on understanding it, but > when a system can do it automatically

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula tape format vs. rsync on deduplicated file systems

2010-05-28 Thread Robert LeBlanc
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Eric Bollengier < eric.bolleng...@baculasystems.com> wrote: First, thank you for the kind replies, this is helping me to ensure I see the big picture. Le vendredi 28 mai 2010 16:42:01, Robert LeBlanc a écrit : > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Eric Bollengier

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula tape format vs. rsync on deduplicated file systems

2010-05-28 Thread Eric Bollengier
Le vendredi 28 mai 2010 16:42:01, Robert LeBlanc a écrit : > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Eric Bollengier < > > eric.bolleng...@baculasystems.com> wrote: > > Hello Robert, > > What would be the result if you do Incremental backup instead of full > > backup ? > > Imagine that you have 1% chang

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula tape format vs. rsync on deduplicated file systems

2010-05-28 Thread Robert LeBlanc
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Eric Bollengier < eric.bolleng...@baculasystems.com> wrote: > Hello Robert, > What would be the result if you do Incremental backup instead of full > backup ? > Imagine that you have 1% changes by day, it will give something like > total_size = 30GB + 30GB*0.01 *

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula tape format vs. rsync on deduplicated file systems

2010-05-27 Thread Eric Bollengier
Hello Robert, On Thursday 27 May 2010 23:18:12 Robert LeBlanc wrote: > Spurred by the discussion last month on the Bacula mailing list about > needing a new archive format when storing Bacula data on disks, I decided > to do a little test. > > The test set-up: > * One lightly used file system ~30