On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> This is getting well outside the realm of Bacula itself, but I would
>> really like to see the Enterprise volume management system (EVMS) in
>> widespread use, as it makes disk hardware migration a painless operation
>> while bringing all the various dis
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Les Mikesell wrote:
> CentOS has some additions to the stock RH version as well,
> like an optional kernel with firewire support and the
> reiserfs and xfs filesystems. It uses yum for updates
> and they generally stay within a few days of RH update
> releases.
This is getti
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Mike Reinehr wrote:
> After reading the merits & weaknesses of RHEL, SUSE, & Centos, I have only one
> question. Have you considered or tried Debian lately?
FWIW Ubuntu is Debian based.
> I settled on Debian
> several years ago after becoming disenchanted with each of the ma
Kern,
On Friday 29 September 2006 10:28, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Friday 29 September 2006 16:53, Mike Reinehr wrote:
> > I'm catching up with this thread with interest after just coming into
> > work this morning. Kern, my sympathy. I can imagine how frustrated you
> > are, but
>
> it
>
> > just
On Friday 29 September 2006 16:53, Mike Reinehr wrote:
> I'm catching up with this thread with interest after just coming into work
> this morning. Kern, my sympathy. I can imagine how frustrated you are, but
it
> just goes to show how good a programmer you are, that it wasn't Bacula after
> al
I'm catching up with this thread with interest after just coming into work
this morning. Kern, my sympathy. I can imagine how frustrated you are, but it
just goes to show how good a programmer you are, that it wasn't Bacula after
all!
After reading the merits & weaknesses of RHEL, SUSE, & Cento
On Friday 29 September 2006 14:39, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >> Centos is _very_ stable. RHEL can be licensed quite cheaply if you don't
> >> buy the support package (about US$10/machine)
> >
> > The last time I looked (some time ago), it was over $200/machin
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Centos is _very_ stable. RHEL can be licensed quite cheaply if you don't
>> buy the support package (about US$10/machine)
>
> The last time I looked (some time ago), it was over $200/machine. That is too
> much for me. For a company or someone serious
I'll chime in with my endorsement of CentOS as well. I use it
specifically for compatibility testing
as a stand-in for RHEL as well as for commercial apps that only
officially support RedHat and have
never had a problem. The CentOS network also provides very timely
security updates at no char
On Friday 29 September 2006 13:43, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >> One of the reason we dumped SLES on our production machines in favour of
> >> RHEL was that SUSE was consistently shipping with mismatching dynamic and
> >> static library versions - and would no
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> One of the reason we dumped SLES on our production machines in favour of
>> RHEL was that SUSE was consistently shipping with mismatching dynamic and
>> static library versions - and would not fix it even when notified.
>>
>> SuSE may be great for home s
On Friday 29 September 2006 12:31, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > After having been totally frustrated chasing this kernel crash for the
last
> > few weeks (I really could not believe that it was not a Bacula bug), I
have
> > finally found a work around and at
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> After having been totally frustrated chasing this kernel crash for the last
> few weeks (I really could not believe that it was not a Bacula bug), I have
> finally found a work around and at the same time, proven that it is a SuSE
> problem.
One of the r
13 matches
Mail list logo
