On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Victor Sterpu wrote:
> I did restarted the bacula services, but still, the reported version is 2.4.4.
> I also installed the latest tar.gz 3.0.1 on another clean machine and the
> reported version is still 2.4.4.
try "which bacula-dir", "which bacula-sd", "which bacula-fd"
It
Christian Gaul wrote:
Victor Sterpu schrieb:
Christian Gaul wrote:
Thomas Mueller schrieb:
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:31:30 +0300, Victor Sterpu wrote:
I've just installed bacula 3.0.1 and I have the following error "File
daemon at ":9102" rejected Hello comman
Victor Sterpu schrieb:
> Christian Gaul wrote:
>> Thomas Mueller schrieb:
>>
>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:31:30 +0300, Victor Sterpu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
I've just installed bacula 3.0.1 and I have the following error "File
daemon at ":9102" rejected Hello command".
Thank
Christian Gaul wrote:
Thomas Mueller schrieb:
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:31:30 +0300, Victor Sterpu wrote:
I've just installed bacula 3.0.1 and I have the following error "File
daemon at ":9102" rejected Hello command".
Thank you.
(maybe) your file daemon is not version 3.x
Thomas Mueller schrieb:
> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:31:30 +0300, Victor Sterpu wrote:
>
>
>> I've just installed bacula 3.0.1 and I have the following error "File
>> daemon at ":9102" rejected Hello command".
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>
> (maybe) your file daemon is not version 3.x . this command IM
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:31:30 +0300, Victor Sterpu wrote:
> I've just installed bacula 3.0.1 and I have the following error "File
> daemon at ":9102" rejected Hello command".
>
> Thank you.
(maybe) your file daemon is not version 3.x . this command IMHO was
introduced with 3.0.
- thomas
-
