Re: [Bacula-users] Backup/Delete/Restore & subsequent backups

2010-01-05 Thread Steve Costaras
-Original Message- From: mehma sarja [mailto:mehmasa...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2010 11:23 PM To: 'Steve Costaras' Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Backup/Delete/Restore & subsequent backups Steve, You have incremental and differen

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup/Delete/Restore & subsequent backups

2010-01-05 Thread mehma sarja
Steve, You have incremental and differential schedules defined, however you don't use them in the incremental and differential job blocks. In fact, you don't call out ANY schedule in either of those jobs. What's it defaulting to? I'd think a "bacula restart" would error out in starting bacula-dir.

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup/Delete/Restore & subsequent backups

2010-01-04 Thread Steve Costaras
No, no backup was run between the full backup when the files were there and the next backup AFTER the files were restored. I've read a bit about the basejob feature though not in detail, it sounds more like a data de-duplication feature which would be useful later on, are you suggesting that

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup/Delete/Restore & subsequent backups

2010-01-04 Thread Ralf Gross
Steve Costaras schrieb: > > I've been diving into Bacula the past 2-3 weeks to come up with a backup > system here for some small server count but very large data store sizes > (30+TiB per server). > > In the coarse of my testing I have noticed something and want to know if > it's by design (