Re: [Bacula-users] 32bit client on 64bit host

2005-08-09 Thread Joshua Kugler
On Monday 08 August 2005 09:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > With the exception of the Itainium, current 64 bit > > processors are 32 > > bit processors with 64 bit extensions for large > > memory support. So, > > there should be no issue running 32 bit clients on > > x86-64 processors. > > > > Dan

Re: [Bacula-users] 32bit client on 64bit host

2005-08-08 Thread drescher0110-bacula
> With the exception of the Itainium, current 64 bit > processors are 32 > bit processors with 64 bit extensions for large > memory support. So, > there should be no issue running 32 bit clients on > x86-64 processors. > > Dan Not to start a flame war but that is only for intel processors. AMD64 i

Re: [Bacula-users] 32bit client on 64bit host

2005-08-08 Thread Jesse Keating
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 11:56 -0500, Dan Johansson wrote: > With the exception of the Itainium, current 64 bit processors are 32 > bit processors with 64 bit extensions for large memory support. So, > there should be no issue running 32 bit clients on x86-64 processors. I know they can run the binar

Re: [Bacula-users] 32bit client on 64bit host

2005-08-08 Thread Dan Johansson
With the exception of the Itainium, current 64 bit processors are 32 bit processors with 64 bit extensions for large memory support. So, there should be no issue running 32 bit clients on x86-64 processors. Dan On 8/8/05, Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any concerns with usin