-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In the message dated: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:05:57 EST,
> The pithy ruminations from Ryan Novosielski on
> were:
> Read the docs.
>
> I have actually wanted to be able to run a full job (that I knew would
> be rather small
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Read the docs.
I have actually wanted to be able to run a full job (that I knew would
be rather small) on one of my incremental tapes as I was adding a job to
the rotation, and I was unable to do so -- full jobs ALWAYS run on my
full pull, as that is
In the message dated: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:18:50 +0200,
The pithy ruminations from Arno Lehmann on
were:
=> Hi,
=>
=> On 10/26/2006 3:47 PM, Raphael Perrin wrote:
=> >
=> > Hi
=> >
=> > Here is my situation.
=> >
=> > Once a month I run a full backup on a "FULL" pool.
=> > Then the monday af
Hi,
On 10/26/2006 3:47 PM, Raphael Perrin wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Here is my situation.
>
> Once a month I run a full backup on a "FULL" pool.
> Then the monday after I run an Incremental backup on an "INCREMENTAL" pool and
> of course it first run a FULL backup which take more than one night. This
>
