> I manually repopulated the database using bscan (is there a better / less
> laborious way to do this?) and did the restore again, now my files came back
> as expected.
You are not supposed to use bscan often, since your file, job and volume
retention should be enough to allow you to restore any
Hi there
I manually repopulated the database using bscan (is there a better / less
laborious way to do this?) and did the restore again, now my files came
back as expected.
In between I also had done a copy job to copy the relevant full backup from
tape to disk, so I'm not sure which of these ste
No, about 900 files were marked, as can be seen in the files expected line.
I did this by marking a directory, which, as I understand it, recursively
marks everything under that directory.
Peter
On Jan 14, 2015 3:59 PM, "John Drescher" wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Peter van Heusden
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Peter van Heusden wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I did a backup of one of our servers in early December 2014. The backup was
> written to a LTO3 tape on the IBM TS3200 tape changer that we have. The
> backup server is running bacula 5.0.0 and the client is bacula 2.2.8.
>
>
