RE: FW: [Bacula-users] Performance testing and tuning

2005-11-08 Thread Ribi Roland
Ove [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:01 PM > To: Ribi Roland > Cc: 'bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net' > Subject: Re: FW: [Bacula-users] Performance testing and tuning > > > Hi, > > On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 09:33 +0100, Ribi Roland w

Re: FW: [Bacula-users] Performance testing and tuning

2005-11-08 Thread Risberg Ove
Hi, On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 09:33 +0100, Ribi Roland wrote: > I think that there are 2 Problems, one is the performance of Bacula or > Postgres itself and also some problems with the tape. I did'nt get more > then 2.6Mb/s with the ufsdump from solaris. > > Anybody can help? > Have you tried to c

Re: FW: [Bacula-users] Performance testing and tuning

2005-11-08 Thread Russell Howe
Ribi Roland wrote: > With spooling it takes arround 10-20min to spool data and write them down to > tape at 2MB/s. But the save of the attributes (writing to the catalog) needs > 2h or more! Looks like the catalog database is underperforming, although maybe 2h is reasonable if you have millions o