Re: [Bacula-users] restoration problem

2007-09-04 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 04.09.2007 14:43,, user100 wrote:: >> Would this be due to the fact that the file retention period is 30 >> days + incremental saves only since the (only) full backup 2 months ago ? > > I don´t know but if you have a short file retention period and > "AutoPrune" set to yes than the fileentr

Re: [Bacula-users] restoration problem

2007-09-04 Thread user100
> Would this be due to the fact that the file retention period is 30 > days + incremental saves only since the (only) full backup 2 months ago ? I don´t know but if you have a short file retention period and "AutoPrune" set to yes than the fileentries should be dropped at least from the databa

Re: [Bacula-users] restoration problem

2007-09-04 Thread Sebastian Perkins
Thanks for the info. Would this be due to the fact that the file retention period is 30 days + incremental saves only since the (only) full backup 2 months ago ? Did the full backup get purged ? If so, does this mean I have to get a full backup done on a regular basis ? Sebastian Perkins

Re: [Bacula-users] restoration problem

2007-08-30 Thread user100
Sebastian Perkins schrieb: >>Is it possible that you have put the directory to the destination in a way that the timestemps did not change? I don't quite understand... I'm still slightly newbie :o) Quote from the bacula site (http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Current_State_Bacula.html#

Re: [Bacula-users] restoration problem

2007-08-30 Thread Sebastian Perkins
I only see 800 files... a lot less than the full directory ! The client is also Linux based and no changes have been made in the directory structure. >>Is it possible that you have put the directory to the destination in a way >>that the timestemps did not change? I don't quite understand...

Re: [Bacula-users] restoration problem

2007-08-30 Thread user100
Sebastian Perkins schrieb: > Hello > > We are using bacula for the first time in restoration mode : bacula > version 2.03 / platform fedora core 6. Bacula has been running w/o save > errors for 2 months. > > A test user has asked us to restore an entire directory = what it > contained last frida

RE: [Bacula-users] restoration problem!

2006-03-24 Thread Zakai Kinan
I am not offended and that was the problem. Thanks, ZK --- Heigl Florian - Munich-MR - external <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 24-Mar 15:50 back-dir: Start Restore Job > > RestoreFiles.2006-03-24_15.50.17 24-Mar 15:50 > back-sd: > > RestoreFiles.2006-03-24_15.50.17 Fatal error: > Could > > not

Re: [Bacula-users] restoration problem!

2006-03-24 Thread Zakai Kinan
this folder is owned by root. Now the folder that sd should write the restore to is owned by bacula while /var/bacula is owned by root. I was thinking that dir writes the log while sd writes the restore. That is my mistake. Thanks a lot, ZK --- Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 24

Re: [Bacula-users] restoration problem!

2006-03-24 Thread Dan Langille
On 24 Mar 2006 at 13:05, Zakai Kinan wrote: > I get the error below for every OS that I try to > restore. I have read the manual. I saw the same > question asked on this list several times still no > answer. I am not sure what else to do. I am using the > configuration that bacula came with. I

RE: [Bacula-users] restoration problem!

2006-03-24 Thread Heigl Florian - Munich-MR - external
> 24-Mar 15:50 back-dir: Start Restore Job > RestoreFiles.2006-03-24_15.50.17 24-Mar 15:50 back-sd: > RestoreFiles.2006-03-24_15.50.17 Fatal error: Could > not create bootstrap file > /var/bacula/back-sd.RestoreFiles.2006-03-24_15.50.17.bootstrap: > ERR=Permission denied 24-Mar 15:38 Bluez: Please