Hi Kern, thank you for answering.
24/04/2014 22:51, Kern Sibbald wrote :
> On 04/23/2014 11:00 AM, le dahut wrote:
>> Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
>>
>> How can I solve this problem ?
>
> I am not sure those commands are used internally by Bacula anymore. They
> were
On 04/23/2014 11:00 AM, le dahut wrote:
> Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
>
> How can I solve this problem ?
I am not sure those commands are used internally by Bacula anymore. They
were originally written to support writing to CD drives, which is no
longer implemented.
23/04/2014 16:44, Téïcée Bacula wrote :
>
>
> Le 23/04/2014 16:05, le dahut a écrit :
>> 23/04/2014 15:07, Téïcée Bacula wrote :
>>> Hello Klaas
>>>
> Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
>>>
>>> Notice what? The mount command used in a device don't fail the job? Well
>>>
Le 23/04/2014 16:05, le dahut a écrit :
> 23/04/2014 15:07, Téïcée Bacula wrote :
>> Hello Klaas
>>
Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
>>
>> Notice what? The mount command used in a device don't fail the job? Well
>> I never needed it.
>> Having the detail of your mo
On 4/23/2014 9:24 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>> - you might also consider to use Messages resource and then "capture"
>> the mount message and do the appropriate commands / actions accordingly
>>
> Good point. With this you could accomplish the task inside of bacula
> and without having to use ssh.
> There could be several ways to manage this and IMHO the following should
> be valid:
> - based on John's answer, you might run a "script before" on the FD
> hosted by your SD which will fail the job accordingly. The matter here
> is not to actually mount the drive rather than testing the fact th
23/04/2014 15:07, Téïcée Bacula wrote :
> Hello Klaas
>
>>> Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
>
> Notice what? The mount command used in a device don't fail the job? Well
> I never needed it.
> Having the detail of your mount operation would probably help a bit or
> at lea
> Ubuntu 12.04 LTS' Bacula version is Bacula 5.2.5. Maybe this is fixed in
> higher versions ? (in which case we will recompile a newer Bacula)
I am not sure if this is a bug or by design.
John
--
Start Your Social Netwo
23/04/2014 13:23, John Drescher wrote :
>> Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
>>
>> How can I solve this problem ?
>>
>
> I would try creating a run before job that uses ssh to connect to the
> remote machine with the SD and in this run before job check if the
> mount succe
Hello Klaas
>> Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
Notice what? The mount command used in a device don't fail the job? Well
I never needed it.
Having the detail of your mount operation would probably help a bit or
at least knowing in which context you are trying to do thi
> Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
>
> How can I solve this problem ?
>
I would try creating a run before job that uses ssh to connect to the
remote machine with the SD and in this run before job check if the
mount succeeds.
John
---
Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
How can I solve this problem ?
14/04/2014 11:44, le dahut wrote :
> Hello,
>
> Bacula 5.2.5-0ubuntu6.2 (on 12.04 LTS)
>
> In bacula-sd.conf I have :
> Name = FileStorage
> LabelMedia = yes
> Automatic Mount = yes
> Archi
Ok, so this is not an issue for me since SD does not run on the same
machine than DIR and FD.
Thank you anyway.
Le 14/04/2014 21:49, Ana Emília M. Arruda a écrit :
> Sorry Klass,
>
> I forgot to tell you that the "Run Script" directive you should put in
> the job resource definition.
>
> Regar
Hi,
SD (Storage Daemon) is running on a different machine than FD and DIR.
Can RunScript be used inside a Storage configuration ?
Le 14/04/2014 18:30, Ana Emília M. Arruda a écrit :
> Hi Klaas,
>
> I don´t know if there is a better solution, but I think you can call the
> mount script inside a
Sorry Klass,
I forgot to tell you that the "Run Script" directive you should put in the
job resource definition.
Regards,
Ana
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Ana Emília M. Arruda <
emiliaarr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Klaas,
>
> I don´t know if there is a better solution, but I think you can c
Hi Klaas,
I don´t know if there is a better solution, but I think you can call the
mount script inside a "run script" like:
RunScript {
RunsWhen = Before
FailJobOnError = Yes
Command = "sudo /sbin/baculamount.py --mount"}
(from http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=bacula_manual:the_job
Rui Goncalves escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new in Bacula. ( vers. 1.38.2)
>
> I'm testing a restore and I get this msg:
>
> For this problem wich is the correct syntax for mount command.
>
> 23-Mar 17:41 lis-backup-sd: Please mount Volume "UG2034L1" on Storage
> Device "Drive-1" (/dev/nst0
Rui Goncalves escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new in Bacula. ( vers. 1.38.2)
>
> I'm testing a restore and I get this msg:
>
> For this problem wich is the correct syntax for mount command.
>
> 23-Mar 17:41 lis-backup-sd: Please mount Volume "UG2034L1" on Storage
> Device "Drive-1" (/dev/nst0
I have used the following device resource in bacula-sd.conf
VolumePollInterval = 60
OfflineOnUnmount = yes
CloseOnPoll = yes
and now bacula detects the volume on his own without me needing to run
the mount command from bconsole.
Thank you for your help,
Maurizio
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 18:14, Chr
Use "mount storage=DDS-4".
Thanks,
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Maurizio Santini
> Sent: Monday, 15 August, 2005 11:36
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Bacula-users] mount command
>
> Hello,
>
> I
20 matches
Mail list logo
