On Friday 24 June 2005 00:57, Jesus Salvo Jr. wrote:
> On Friday 24 June 2005 00:32, Chris Lee wrote:
> > I'm interested in this also. Perhaps a Minimum Spool Size directive so
> > that the spool reaches a critical size to avoid shoe shining tapes, and
> > once that size is reached the storage dae
On Friday 24 June 2005 00:32, Chris Lee wrote:
> I'm interested in this also. Perhaps a Minimum Spool Size directive so
> that the spool reaches a critical size to avoid shoe shining tapes, and
> once that size is reached the storage daemon starts de-spooling from the
> beginning of the spool file
Message-
> From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 23 June, 2005 09:56
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Chris Lee; 'Jesus Salvo Jr.'
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling again while de-spooling to tape
>
> On Thursday 23 Ju
On Thursday 23 June 2005 16:32, Chris Lee wrote:
> I'm interested in this also. Perhaps a Minimum Spool Size directive so
> that the spool reaches a critical size to avoid shoe shining tapes, and
> once that size is reached the storage daemon starts de-spooling from the
> beginning of the spool fi
I'm interested in this also. Perhaps a Minimum Spool Size directive so that
the spool reaches a critical size to avoid shoe shining tapes, and once that
size is reached the storage daemon starts de-spooling from the beginning of
the spool file to the tape while still writing data from the file dae
