[ Sorry, meant to send it to the list ]
On 3/12/07, Pierre Bernhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pierre Bernhardt schrieb:
> > Hello,
> >
> > the signature file don't corrospond to the file:
> >
> > $ /cygdrive/c/Programme/Internet/GnuPT/GPG/gpg.exe -d
> > winbacula-2.0.3.exe.sig
> > gpg: Signat
Pierre Bernhardt schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> the signature file don't corrospond to the file:
>
> $ /cygdrive/c/Programme/Internet/GnuPT/GPG/gpg.exe -d winbacula-2.0.3.exe.sig
> gpg: Signature made 03/01/07 10:03:11 using DSA key ID 10A792AD
> gpg: BAD signature from "Bacula Distribution Verification K
Kern Sibbald schrieb:
> On Sunday 11 March 2007 17:08, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
>> Hello,
Hi,
>>
>> the signature file don't corrospond to the file:
>>
>> $ /cygdrive/c/Programme/Internet/GnuPT/GPG/gpg.exe -d
>> winbacula-2.0.3.exe.sig gpg: Signature made 03/01/07 10:03:11 using DSA key
>> ID 10A792
On Sunday 11 March 2007 17:08, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the signature file don't corrospond to the file:
>
> $ /cygdrive/c/Programme/Internet/GnuPT/GPG/gpg.exe -d
> winbacula-2.0.3.exe.sig gpg: Signature made 03/01/07 10:03:11 using DSA key
> ID 10A792AD
> gpg: BAD signature from "Bacul
Hello,
the signature file don't corrospond to the file:
$ /cygdrive/c/Programme/Internet/GnuPT/GPG/gpg.exe -d winbacula-2.0.3.exe.sig
gpg: Signature made 03/01/07 10:03:11 using DSA key ID 10A792AD
gpg: BAD signature from "Bacula Distribution Verification Key (www.bacula.org)"
$ /cygdrive/c/Prog
