Re: [Bacula-users] volume selection algorithm again

2015-10-31 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 2015-10-31 08:23, Josh Fisher wrote: > Volume selection is fairly complex. The order in which volumes are > purged greatly affects the next available volume selection. With > multiple pools, varied retention times, and occasional error jobs, there > is no way to maintain a static order. While

Re: [Bacula-users] volume selection algorithm again

2015-10-31 Thread Josh Fisher
On 10/30/2015 2:16 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > I'm burning in a 7.0.5 (since I don't see 7.2 RPMs in Simone's repo) > server with the latest vchanger and 8 disk "magazines", 3TB each. Here's > what I get backing up a 5+TB filesystem -- note that this is just a > burn-in, not production: > > - full

Re: [Bacula-users] volume selection algorithm again

2015-10-30 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 10/30/2015 01:16 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > This is commodity spinning run disks "rust" -^^^ -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -

[Bacula-users] volume selection algorithm again

2015-10-30 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
I'm burning in a 7.0.5 (since I don't see 7.2 RPMs in Simone's repo) server with the latest vchanger and 8 disk "magazines", 3TB each. Here's what I get backing up a 5+TB filesystem -- note that this is just a burn-in, not production: - full backup runs from 22-Oct 21:05 to 29-Oct 02:36, - it's d