Joseph Spenner wrote:
> Ok, I just used bconsole and recovered a directory in little time at all.
> So, bat is the problem. I can use bconsole instead. I might try to go back
> to using 1TB files and see how it performs as well.
> Thanks for the tip!
I can confirm this and will post more ful
--- On Tue, 5/11/10, John Drescher wrote:
> I first must let bat (I think?) load the WHOLE index before
> I get a list of what is possible to select. This is what
> appears to take hours. Or is this possible faster in
> bconsole?
> >
>
> I do not really use bat, nor have I restored anything f
> Right, but in order to do this, I first must let bat (I think?) load the
> WHOLE index before I get a list of what is possible to select. This is what
> appears to take hours. Or is this possible faster in bconsole?
>
I do not really use bat, nor have I restored anything from any version
of
--- On Tue, 5/11/10, John Drescher wrote:
>
> > 3) If I use bconsole I can specify a single file to
> recover and it is VERY fast. But there doesn't seem to be
> a way to specify an entire directory. Or am I not looking
> in the right place?
> >
>
> You run restore and mark the folder you wan
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> I'm currently set up with a File based backup system (no tapes). Initially I
> wanted to make 1TB files, but learned (and read) that recovery of a backup is
> very slow with large files. So, I reconfigured it to create 1GB files.
Also
I'm currently set up with a File based backup system (no tapes). Initially I
wanted to make 1TB files, but learned (and read) that recovery of a backup is
very slow with large files. So, I reconfigured it to create 1GB files. This
will create significantly more files (1000x) but this won't be
