Re: [Bacula-users] very slow netapp nfs backup

2008-01-17 Thread Michael Galloway
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:40:51PM +0100, Svein-Erik Lund wrote: > On Friday 28 December 2007 15:31:48 Michael Galloway wrote: > > could this be a bacula or postgres issue (my db has grown to over 2GB in > > size)? > > I'm not shure if it will have any effect or not, but you could try a "VACUUM

Re: [Bacula-users] very slow netapp nfs backup

2008-01-17 Thread Svein-Erik Lund
On Friday 28 December 2007 15:31:48 Michael Galloway wrote: > could this be a bacula or postgres issue (my db has grown to over 2GB in > size)? I'm not shure if it will have any effect or not, but you could try a "VACUUM FULL;" of the database. -- Svein-Erik Lund --

Re: [Bacula-users] very slow netapp nfs backup

2007-12-28 Thread Michael Galloway
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 10:13:14AM -0500, Michael Galloway wrote: > i'm having trouble getting a netapp nfs mount backed up to my local > bacula server. this is bacula 2.2.6 patched. i think the problem is > the large number of files on the netapp. the backup just slows to a > crawl: > > molbio-f

[Bacula-users] very slow netapp nfs backup

2007-12-27 Thread Michael Galloway
i'm having trouble getting a netapp nfs mount backed up to my local bacula server. this is bacula 2.2.6 patched. i think the problem is the large number of files on the netapp. the backup just slows to a crawl: molbio-fd Version: 2.2.6 (10 November 2007) x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu redhat Daemon s