On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
> On 12/03/13 16:46, mark.berg...@uphs.upenn.edu wrote:
>>
>> In my experience, the readability of barcode labels is highly dependant on
>> the
>> combination of the label and the barcode reader.
>>
>
> What brand/model libraries are you using?
>
On 12/03/13 16:46, mark.berg...@uphs.upenn.edu wrote:
>
> In my experience, the readability of barcode labels is highly dependant on the
> combination of the label and the barcode reader.
>
What brand/model libraries are you using?
Overland (at least) are fairly immune to alignment/placement issu
In the message dated: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:44:25 -0400,
The pithy ruminations from John Drescher on
were:
=> > DO NOT PRINT YOUR OWN LABELS
=> > EVER
=>
=> I have for the last 100 or so tapes and I have had 0 issues with that.
=>
In my experience, the readability of barcode labels is highly d
No slot on my tapes for labels
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> Glue? My labels slide into a slot. No sticking involved.
>
> --
> Dan Langille
> http://langille.org/
>
>
> On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:21 AM, Simon Tyler wrote:
>
> AFAIK we didn't have issues at first either. I
All I can tell you is what happens when I don't use pre-printed labels.
Change tapes
update slots, label barcodes
a random tape is not recognized
do no tape change, take out magazine, reinsert tape in magazine
update slots
tape recognized
This only happened with home made labels. Maybe I should r
Glue? My labels slide into a slot. No sticking involved.
--
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:21 AM, Simon Tyler wrote:
> AFAIK we didn't have issues at first either. I think eventually the glue
> started loosening up
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:44 PM, John Dr
> Hi John, I just checked with the guy who started printing labels and he said
> he started doing that in 2009. We didn't really notice issues until we
> switched to Bacula (from Netvault), so they were working fine for at least 3
> years. I wonder if it's possible that Bacula drives the bar code r
AFAIK we didn't have issues at first either. I think eventually the glue
started loosening up
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:44 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> > DO NOT PRINT YOUR OWN LABELS
> > EVER
>
> I have for the last 100 or so tapes and I have had 0 issues with that.
>
> John
>
--
On 12/03/2013 8:48 AM, Simon Tyler wrote:
[SNIP]
> This problem was really very annoying and intermittent, and I hope no
> one else encounters it, but just in case you do: DO NOT PRINT YOUR OWN
> LABELS EVER
I've never had a problem with labels I have printed myself.
I have mix-and-matched variou
> DO NOT PRINT YOUR OWN LABELS
> EVER
I have for the last 100 or so tapes and I have had 0 issues with that.
John
--
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security,
Although this issue is old, I thought I should update the list on
resolution:
As noted below and in several previous posts, I had a lot of problems with
tapes not being recognized. It appears that the tapes were labelled by
someone generating a barcode online, and printing out the bar code labels
On Nov 26, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Simon Tyler wrote:
> Today I had some tapes brought in from offsite storage and I loaded them into
> the autoloader. One of the tapes was recognized, and the other (slot 7)
> showed in the Autoloader website and in the bacula (backup software) as Empty
> or not re
Today I had some tapes brought in from offsite storage and I loaded them
into the autoloader. One of the tapes was recognized, and the other (slot
7) showed in the Autoloader website and in the bacula (backup software) as
Empty or not recognized.
I mounted the unrecognized tape, stopped bacula
13 matches
Mail list logo
