Re: [Bacula-users] tape throughput

2006-03-01 Thread Rudolf Cejka
Sebastian Stark wrote (2006/03/01): > >>I never get more than ~28MB/s backing up to an HP Ultrium-3 drive. I > >Yes, if you use LTO-2 cartridges, you can get max. LTO-2 speeds. > Then 28MB/s looks pretty good, right? 30 is the most you can get out > of LTO-2 cartridges if I remember correctly. S

Re: [Bacula-users] tape throughput

2006-03-01 Thread Sebastian Stark
On 01.03.2006, at 12:56, Rudolf Cejka wrote: Sebastian Stark wrote (2006/03/01): I never get more than ~28MB/s backing up to an HP Ultrium-3 drive. I Momentary speed or overall speed including data spooling, tape write and database update? For momentary it is slow, for overall it is relative

Re: [Bacula-users] tape throughput

2006-03-01 Thread Rudolf Cejka
Sebastian Stark wrote (2006/03/01): > I never get more than ~28MB/s backing up to an HP Ultrium-3 drive. I Momentary speed or overall speed including data spooling, tape write and database update? For momentary it is slow, for overall it is relatively fast. > configured spooling to a locally atta

[Bacula-users] tape throughput

2006-03-01 Thread Sebastian Stark
What tape throughput are people seeing under Solaris (10)? I never get more than ~28MB/s backing up to an HP Ultrium-3 drive. I configured spooling to a locally attached raid that allows for much faster througput, bonnie++ says ~160MB/s when reading block-wise. Could this be a problem with