Re: [Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-09 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:31:20 +0100, Kern Sibbald said: > > On Monday 09 February 2009 13:10:12 Martin Simmons wrote: > > > On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:17:33 +0100, Kern Sibbald said: > > > > > > On Saturday 07 February 2009 11:33:58 Ralf Gross wrote: > > > > Kern Sibbald schrieb: > > > > > The

Re: [Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 09 February 2009 13:10:12 Martin Simmons wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:17:33 +0100, Kern Sibbald said: > > > > On Saturday 07 February 2009 11:33:58 Ralf Gross wrote: > > > Kern Sibbald schrieb: > > > > The problem described in the email below is probably an important > > > > data

Re: [Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-09 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:17:33 +0100, Kern Sibbald said: > > On Saturday 07 February 2009 11:33:58 Ralf Gross wrote: > > Kern Sibbald schrieb: > > > The problem described in the email below is probably an important data > > > loss problem due (most likely) to an I/O error, but more importantly

Re: [Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-07 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 07 February 2009 12:26:12 Ralf Gross wrote: > Kern Sibbald schrieb: > > On Saturday 07 February 2009 11:33:58 Ralf Gross wrote: > > > Kern Sibbald schrieb: > > > > The problem described in the email below is probably an important > > > > data loss problem due (most likely) to an I/O err

Re: [Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-07 Thread Ralf Gross
Kern Sibbald schrieb: > On Saturday 07 February 2009 11:33:58 Ralf Gross wrote: > > Kern Sibbald schrieb: > > > The problem described in the email below is probably an important data > > > loss problem due (most likely) to an I/O error, but more importantly due > > > to a misconfigured tape drive.

Re: [Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-07 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 07 February 2009 11:33:58 Ralf Gross wrote: > Kern Sibbald schrieb: > > The problem described in the email below is probably an important data > > loss problem due (most likely) to an I/O error, but more importantly due > > to a misconfigured tape drive. From the information I see belo

Re: [Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-07 Thread Ralf Gross
Kern Sibbald schrieb: > > The problem described in the email below is probably an important data loss > problem due (most likely) to an I/O error, but more importantly due to a > misconfigured tape drive. From the information I see below, it appears to me > that you have lost significant data.

Re: [Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-05 Thread Michael Galloway
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:54:33PM +0100, Bastian Friedrich wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 04 February 2009, Ralf Gross wrote: > > > > JobId 9250: Error: block.c:568 Write error at 411:14724 on device > > "ULTRIUM-TD4-D2" (/dev/ULTRIUM-TD4-D2). ERR=Eingabe-/Ausgabefehler. > > JobId 9250: Error: Re

Re: [Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-05 Thread Bastian Friedrich
Hi, On Wednesday 04 February 2009, Ralf Gross wrote: > > JobId 9250: Error: block.c:568 Write error at 411:14724 on device > "ULTRIUM-TD4-D2" (/dev/ULTRIUM-TD4-D2). ERR=Eingabe-/Ausgabefehler. > JobId 9250: Error: Re-read of last block OK, but block numbers differ. > Last block=32305

Re: [Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-05 Thread Ralf Gross
Kern Sibbald schrieb: > On Thursday 05 February 2009 12:48:18 Ralf Gross wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > The problem described in the email below is probably an important data > > > loss problem due (most likely) to an I/O error, but more importantly due > > > to a misconfigured tape drive. From the i

Re: [Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 05 February 2009 12:48:18 Ralf Gross wrote: > Hello, > > > The problem described in the email below is probably an important data > > loss problem due (most likely) to an I/O error, but more importantly due > > to a misconfigured tape drive. From the information I see below, it > > app

Re: [Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-05 Thread Ralf Gross
Hello, > The problem described in the email below is probably an important data loss > problem due (most likely) to an I/O error, but more importantly due to a > misconfigured tape drive. From the information I see below, it appears to me > that you have lost significant data. This is probabl

[Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, The problem described in the email below is probably an important data loss problem due (most likely) to an I/O error, but more importantly due to a misconfigured tape drive. From the information I see below, it appears to me that you have lost significant data. This is probably due to

Re: [Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-04 Thread Ralf Gross
Ralf Gross schrieb: > Hi, > > I have a problem with a new lto-4 tape. Only 411 GB were written on it, then > bacula detected an write error. > > JobId 9250: Error: block.c:568 Write error at 411:14724 on device > "ULTRIUM-TD4-D2" > (/dev/ULTRIUM-TD4-D2). ERR=Eingabe-/Ausgabefehler.

[Bacula-users] tape error and bacula: ...block numbers differ

2009-02-04 Thread Ralf Gross
Hi, I have a problem with a new lto-4 tape. Only 411 GB were written on it, then bacula detected an write error. JobId 9250: Error: block.c:568 Write error at 411:14724 on device "ULTRIUM-TD4-D2" (/dev/ULTRIUM-TD4-D2). ERR=Eingabe-/Ausgabefehler. JobId 9250: Error: Re-read of last