Hi,
I'll forward this to the devel list, because I suppose people there
are interested in your experience...
26.06.2007 18:48,, Manuel Wolff wrote::
>
>
> Manuel Wolff wrote:
>>
>>
>> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>>>
>>> the current beta version 2.1.10 has some improvements that should speed
>>> up ca
Manuel Wolff wrote:
>
>
>
> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>>
>>
>> the current beta version 2.1.10 has some improvements that should speed
>> up catalog inserts *a lot*. I'd recommend to give it a try if you dare
>> running a beta version on a production system.
>>
>> As far as I know, there is ne
Arno Lehmann wrote:
>
>
> the current beta version 2.1.10 has some improvements that should speed
> up catalog inserts *a lot*. I'd recommend to give it a try if you dare
> running a beta version on a production system.
>
> As far as I know, there is neither a tape format change, nor a cata
* Manuel Wolff schrieb am 22.05.07 um 22:20 Uhr:
> Hi List
>
> One of our servers with about 3.5 millions of files produces a
> spool file for the attributes of about 1GB.
>
> "status storage" at 20:30
> Attr spooling: 1 active jobs, 523,898,883 bytes; 10 total jobs,
> 1,078,726,662 max bytes.
>
Hi,
On 5/22/2007 10:20 PM, Manuel Wolff wrote:
> Hi List
>
> One of our servers with about 3.5 millions of files produces a
> spool file for the attributes of about 1GB.
>
> "status storage" at 20:30
> Attr spooling: 1 active jobs, 523,898,883 bytes; 10 total jobs,
> 1,078,726,662 max bytes.
>
Hi List
One of our servers with about 3.5 millions of files produces a
spool file for the attributes of about 1GB.
"status storage" at 20:30
Attr spooling: 1 active jobs, 523,898,883 bytes; 10 total jobs,
1,078,726,662 max bytes.
At 17:30 it was about 720MB
Somewhere seems to be a bottleneck.
