Hi!
Was the problem solved?
Regards,
Alexander.
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first___
On 03/03/10 20:19, Martin Simmons wrote:
> Do you have Access Control Lists or Mandatory Access Control running that
> could change the traditional model of user/group access to files?
None of them.
bye & Thanks
av.
-
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:39:46 +0100, Andrea Venturoli said:
>
> On 03/02/10 15:32, Martin Simmons wrote:
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
>
>
> > No sure if you solved this yet
>
> No, I didn't.
>
>
>
> > but did /etc/group contain that entry when you started bacula-sd?
>
> Yes, it did.
On 03/02/10 15:32, Martin Simmons wrote:
Thanks for your answer.
> No sure if you solved this yet
No, I didn't.
> but did /etc/group contain that entry when you started bacula-sd?
Yes, it did.
> Does "procstat -s 70980" show 5 (i.e. operator) in the groups list for the
> bacula-sd proce
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:26:19 +0100, Andrea Venturoli said:
>
> Hello.
>
> I've done a new installation of Bacula 5.0.0 on FreeBSD 7.2p6/amd64.
> My bacula-sd.conf has the following:
>
> Device {
>Name = DAT160
>Description = "DAT160 for FreeBSD"
>Media Type = DAT160
>Archiv
Hello.
I've done a new installation of Bacula 5.0.0 on FreeBSD 7.2p6/amd64.
My bacula-sd.conf has the following:
Device {
Name = DAT160
Description = "DAT160 for FreeBSD"
Media Type = DAT160
Archive Device = /dev/nsa0
AutomaticMount = yes; # when device opened, read i
