Re: [Bacula-users] severity of warnings issued by Bacula

2011-05-06 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 06 May 2011 08:42:38 +0200, Jeremy Maes said: > > Op 5/05/2011 15:56, Martin Simmons schreef: > >> On Thu, 05 May 2011 09:27:03 +0200, Jeremy Maes said: > >> Op 4/05/2011 18:07, Gavin McCullagh schreef: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> like many people I imagine, we get various warnings fro

Re: [Bacula-users] severity of warnings issued by Bacula

2011-05-05 Thread Jeremy Maes
Op 5/05/2011 15:56, Martin Simmons schreef: >> On Thu, 05 May 2011 09:27:03 +0200, Jeremy Maes said: >> Op 4/05/2011 18:07, Gavin McCullagh schreef: >>> Hi, >>> >>> like many people I imagine, we get various warnings from the Bacula >>> daemons, particularly the file daemons. There are some wh

Re: [Bacula-users] severity of warnings issued by Bacula

2011-05-05 Thread Jason A. Kates
NFS mounts are also in the same class. 27-Apr 20:37 web02 JobId 154536: Error: xattr.c:347 llistxattr error on file "/web/zend": ERR=Success 27-Apr 20:38 web02 JobId 154536: Error: Encountered 1 xattr errors while doing backup This would be an example file set that don't backup NFS but will get t

Re: [Bacula-users] severity of warnings issued by Bacula

2011-05-05 Thread Gavin McCullagh
Hi, On Thu, 05 May 2011, Jeremy Maes wrote: > All you need to do to suppress those messages is add all the > junction points on the given windows system to the exclude list of > your filesystem. I appreciate that I can do that, but it seems like having to create a mass of wilddir entries in the

Re: [Bacula-users] severity of warnings issued by Bacula

2011-05-05 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 05/05/11 09:56, Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Thu, 05 May 2011 09:27:03 +0200, Jeremy Maes said: >> >> Op 4/05/2011 18:07, Gavin McCullagh schreef: >>> Hi, >>> >>> like many people I imagine, we get various warnings from the Bacula >>> daemons, particularly the file daemons. There are some wh

Re: [Bacula-users] severity of warnings issued by Bacula

2011-05-05 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 05 May 2011 09:27:03 +0200, Jeremy Maes said: > > Op 4/05/2011 18:07, Gavin McCullagh schreef: > > Hi, > > > > like many people I imagine, we get various warnings from the Bacula > > daemons, particularly the file daemons. There are some which seem like > > it would be nice to simpl

Re: [Bacula-users] severity of warnings issued by Bacula

2011-05-05 Thread Jeremy Maes
Op 4/05/2011 18:07, Gavin McCullagh schreef: > Hi, > > like many people I imagine, we get various warnings from the Bacula > daemons, particularly the file daemons. There are some which seem like > it would be nice to simply suppress them and some which are severe and I'd > actually like more atte

[Bacula-users] severity of warnings issued by Bacula

2011-05-04 Thread Gavin McCullagh
Hi, like many people I imagine, we get various warnings from the Bacula daemons, particularly the file daemons. There are some which seem like it would be nice to simply suppress them and some which are severe and I'd actually like more attention drawn to them. To give an example, on a director'